Will Jam v. IFC Increase Multilateral Development Banks’ US Legal Exposure?

No longer entitled to near absolute immunity, MDBs may be prompted to modify their charters, lending practices, and accountability mechanisms.

Key Points:

..The Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit’s ruling, holding that international organizations are entitled to the same limited immunity as granted to foreign governments under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), enacted in 1976.

..A Multilateral Development Bank’s (MDB’s) exposure to suits in the US depends on the immunity provisions within the MDB’s charter, application of the FSIA’s “commercial activity” exception, and the availability of a forum non conveniens defense.

..Jam may lead MDBs to amend their charters to include stronger immunity provisions, strengthen environmental and social covenants in negotiated loans and more strictly enforce such covenants, issue fewer loans in high-risk industries and regions, or bolster their independent accountability mechanisms.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact
more
less

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide