Will More Money Managers Start Voting Shares Based on Climate Issues? Fidelity International Gets in the Game

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law
Contact

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

In the wake of Engine No.1’s successful effort to elect more climate-friendly directors at Exxon and the increasingly aggressive action by BlackRock to take climate into account in its investment management decisions, the whole world is watching for further evidence of capitalism’s efforts to save the world from, well, capitalism.

The latest news is from Fidelity International (not to be confused with Fidelity Management and Research), which this week issued its “Sustainable Investing Voting Principles and Guidelines.”

The Guidelines are a mixed bag and I think that reaction to them will depend upon whether one is a glass half-full or glass half-empty type.  Here’s the meat of the climate provisions:

We believe a minimum standard is for companies to provide:

– A stated policy on climate change.

– Emissions data.

– Confirmation of discussion and oversight of climate change at the board level.

In addition, for companies in the most affected industries, we strongly encourage the following:

– Targets for reducing greenhouse emissions.

– Description of the impacts of climate-related risks and opportunities on their businesses, strategy and financial planning.

– Scenario planning including multiple scenarios.

– Impact scenario referencing 1.5°C limits.

For climate hawks, also known as the glass half-empty types, these minimum standards are indeed pretty minimal; they don’t actually require very much from the companies in which Fidelity International invests.  For glass half-full types, the Guidelines are part of a significant trend indicating that capitalism is starting to police itself.

For my own part, I’ve always felt that a glass that is half full is also half empty.  These Guidelines do appear to be part of an increasing trend of shareholder activism on climate, but it’s a trend that going to have to start accelerating pretty quickly if it’s going to result in meaningful action.  And it’s a trend that has to work in concert with legislation and regulation.  It’s a complement to government action, not a substitute for government action.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law
Contact
more
less

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.