Worthless Services/Substandard Quality of Care Criminal Prosecutions May Be on the Rise

by Baker Ober Health Law
Contact

If you are an operator of a skilled nursing facility (SNF), you might have faced the reality of insufficient medical staff and how it impacts your ability to deliver quality patient care to your residents. Or, you might have grappled with issues related to the adequacy of your medical records documentation. While such scenarios may occur for a variety of innocuous reasons, recent prosecutions may presage that federal and state government agencies will henceforth look more closely at such issues from a criminal perspective. These recent cases demonstrate that the government is willing to investigate and pursue criminal cases against SNF operators where the allegations related to irregular paperwork and inadequate staffing render “worthless” or substandard the quality of care administered to the elderly.

United States v. Houser

On June 19, 2014, in United States v. Houser, 2014 BL 171094, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the first reported criminal conviction and sentence following a trial for “worthless services” health care fraud. By way of background, in 2004, George Houser assumed ownership and control over three Georgia SNFs whose majority population consisted of Medicare and Medicaid recipients. Thereafter, from 2004 to 2007, Ohio officials conducted surveys at the facilities, some of which were in response to complaints lodged by residents’ families. There are allegations in the record that Houser sometimes received advance notice that the surveys were to occur. Officials cited numerous deficiencies at the facilities and, ultimately, shut them down in 2007 based on the risk to the health and safety of residents. Id. at 3.

In April 2012, following an investigation and indictment, Houser and his wife were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the Medicare and Medicaid programs for filing claims for services that the government maintained were worthless. The government alleged that from 2004 to 2007 the Housers sought and received reimbursement for services that they, in fact, failed to provide to residents of three SNFs, and for services that were so grossly deficient or substandard as to be worthless. In particular, the Housers were convicted for failing to provide required and necessary services, like food, electricity, adult diapers, medication, and dialysis, and for providing services that “were of a quality that failed to meet professionally recognized standards of health care.” Id. at 7. Part of the government’s proof at trial included evidence that: Houser mandated staffing cuts at the facilities, which caused resident care to suffer; insufficient amount of foods were provided to the residents because Houser had failed to pay the vendors, which caused the residents to lose weight; and Houser instructed staff to stop accurately reporting in patients’ medical records their weight loss.

After Houser was sentenced to a 10-year prison term he appealed, asserting that using the heath care fraud conspiracy statute to prosecute the concept of worthless services rendered the statute unconstitutionally vague. Houser argued that the concept of the “desirability” of services “has no place in an evaluation of worthlessness because what is totally undesirable to one person nevertheless may have value for another.” Id. at 6. Ultimately, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed his conviction without opining on whether “concept of worthless services based on inadequacy or undesirability is unconstitutionally vague” because the lower court’s conviction was based both on the failure to provide statutorily required services and deficient services Id. at 13.

United States v. Klein, et al.

More recently, on June 24, 2014, a Virginia federal grand jury indicted four individuals for allegedly committing a multi-faceted fraud scheme related to a SNF that they operated. The charges include a scheme to defraud Medicare and Medicaid, a racketeering conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and a conspiracy to make false statements to Medicare and Medicaid. United States v. Klein, Dietrich, Menten & Cox, Indictment, No. 2:14 CR 00011 (W.D. Va. June 24, 2014) [PDF]. The indictment alleges that the four defendants, who are an owner and managers of the facility, defrauded many entities, including the vendors who supplied goods and services to the SNF. The indictment further alleges that the defendants defrauded Medicare and Medicaid by causing: the SNF to operate with insufficient nursing aide staff and supplies; residents to subsist in unsanitary conditions; and residents to receive no or inadequate pressure sore treatment. The indictment depicts with particularity the care of five residents, which the government alleges was so substandard that the patients suffered bodily injury. The indictment also asserts that two defendants coached a witness scheduled to testify before a federal grand jury to say that the facility was not short staffed, and that “we did nothing wrong.” Indictment at 8–13.

In addition, according to the indictment, from approximately 2008 to 2012, state regulatory officials conducted multiple surveys at the facility, some in response to complaints. State regulatory officials identified several quality-of-care deficiencies during this time period, which led to the facility’s designation as a “special focus facility,” and to frequent denials of Medicare and Medicaid claims for new residents. Indictment at 5–7.

Furthermore, the indictment alleges that two defendants directed nursing staff to make false entries in the residents’ medical records and, in anticipation of government surveys, allegedly “fill[ed] in the holes” in certain patients’ medical records, so that it would appear that the care provided to the residents complied with federal SNF regulatory requirements. Id. at 35–36.

State of Ohio County of Franklin v. Hitchens & Autumn Healthcare of Zanesville, Inc.

On June 27, 2014, an Ohio special grand jury indicted the owner of a nursing facility, Steven L. Hitchens, on 39 felony and misdemeanor offenses, including engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, Medicaid fraud, tampering with medical records, and unlawful operation of a nursing home. The allegations set forth in the indictment [PDF] include: false and fraudulent statements purportedly made by Hitchens to the Ohio Department of Medicaid related to Minimum Data Set assessments and family satisfaction surveys; alleged forgeries of nurses’ notes and medical records that masked the substandard care that residents received; and the destruction, concealment and removal of nurses’ notes and medical records with the purpose of thwarting the investigation of his nursing facility regarding complaints of deficient patient care. A nursing home operated by Hitchens, Autumn Healthcare of Zanesville, Inc., was also indicted for engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, Medicaid fraud, evidence tampering, forgery, and theft. While the indictment does not provide an overwhelming amount of detail, news media sources claim that the indictments followed a roughly two-year investigation by regulatory officials and law enforcement into complaints from residents’ families about the inadequate care that residents received, including withholding nutrition and medications. See, e.g., Autumn Healthcare Owner Charged with Medicaid Fraud, Forgery, Newark Advocate (June 29, 2014).

In light of these recent criminal enforcement actions, what can a skilled nursing facility do to prevent an investigation and ultimate prosecution for “worthless services” or substandard resident care? Nursing facilities should not take only the obvious steps of addressing staff shortages and ensuring that their staff dispense medically appropriate care to residents. Facilities should also direct and train staff to thoroughly document in residents’ medical records the patient care provided. Failure to do so increases the likelihood that the government could prevail in a worthless services prosecution against your facility based, in part, on incomplete and inaccurate documentation. Consider incentivizing employees to keep excellent documentation and rewarding them for pointing out deficiencies.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Baker Ober Health Law | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Baker Ober Health Law
Contact
more
less

Baker Ober Health Law on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.