WTO Panel Report: Indonesia – Iron or Steel Products

by White & Case LLP
Contact

White & Case LLP

SUMMARY

Decision

A WTO Panel has dismissed claims against Indonesia under the WTO Agreement on Safeguards on the grounds that the challenged duty was not actually a "safeguard measure".  All disputing parties had agreed that the specific duty on iron or steel was a safeguard measure, but the Panel rejected this consensus position.

This is one of a series of reports on WTO Panel or Appellate Body decisions.

The Panel upheld a "stand-alone" challenge against the duty under the Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) obligation of Article I of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994.

Significance of Decision:

This decision reinforces the important principle that WTO Panels are not bound by the positions or arguments of the disputing parties, but must make their own, independent assessment of the issues.

The current dispute is somewhat unusual in that the Panel rejected the concurring views of the complaining parties (Chinese Taipei and Viet Nam) and the defending party (Indonesia) on a critical threshold issue of whether the measure was a safeguard. Indonesia had conducted an investigation under its safeguards legislation, and had notified the resulting duty to the WTO Committee on Safeguards. All disputing parties agreed that the Safeguards Agreement applied, although they differed on whether Indonesia's duty was consistent with that Agreement.

The Panel took a different approach. It noted that Indonesia had no binding tariff obligations under GATT Article II with respect to the products subject to the duty. It stated that the Safeguards Agreement and GATT 1994 define "safeguard measures" in part as those which "suspend a GATT obligation" or "withdraw or modify a GATT concession". The Panel found that as Indonesia was "free to impose any amount of duty it deems appropriate" on these unbound products, the specific duty at issue in this case "did not suspend, withdraw, or modify Indonesia's obligations under Article II of the GATT 1994". The Panel concluded that "[i]n the absence of an obligation preventing a Member's remedial action, there would be obviously no need for that Member to be released from a WTO commitment". Therefore, the Safeguards Agreement did not apply, and the Panel dismissed all claims under that Agreement.

WTO panels and the Appellate Body often accept agreed positions advanced by the disputing parties, and proceed on that basis. However, the current Panel was well within its rights to choose not to do so. Indeed, given the Panel's obligation under Article 11 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding to make an "objective assessment" of the matter before it, including "the applicability of and conformity with the relevant covered agreements", it was required to make its own independent assessment on the applicability of the Safeguards Agreement, despite the "concurring positions" of the disputing parties on this issue.

The Panel's decision in this case hinged primarily on the form of the measure imposed by Indonesia. Indonesia elected to impose a specific duty on products that were unbound in Indonesia's tariff schedule, leading the Panel to conclude that there were no GATT obligations to suspend. The result could have been different if the purported safeguard measure were an import quota rather than a duty, in which case the GATT Article XI rules on quantitative restrictions would apply regardless of whether the product was subject to a tariff binding. Under such a scenario, the Safeguards Agreement would apply. The Panel raised this issue briefly, noting only that "such a measure would have to be based on a WTO-consistent investigation and conclusions".

Both sides may seek to appeal this ruling.

REPORT:

Background: Safeguards investigation leads to a specific duty

In 2014, Indonesia imposed a specific duty on galvalume, a type of flat-rolled iron or steel. The duty was imposed following an investigation under Indonesia's safeguards legislation. This three-year duty was also notified by Indonesia to the WTO Committee on Safeguards. Indonesia applied the duty on imports of galvalume from all sources, although developing countries were exempt.

Importantly, as noted above, Indonesia has no tariff binding obligations with respect to galvalume.

Disputing parties agree that the duty is a safeguard measure

The complaining parties in this dispute, Chinese Taipei and Viet Nam, argued that the specific duty was a safeguard within the meaning of the WTO Safeguards Agreement, and violated that Agreement. In the alternative, they argued that if the duty were not a safeguards measure, it was in any event inconsistent with Indonesia's MFN obligation under GATT Article I.

Indonesia agreed that its measure was a safeguard within the meaning of the Safeguards Agreement, but argued that the duty was consistent with that Agreement.

"Fundamental question" for Panel: whether the duty was a safeguard measure

The Panel began by noting that a "fundamental question" in this dispute was whether the specific duty applied by Indonesia on imports of galvalume was a "safeguard measure" within the meaning of Article 1 of the Safeguards Agreement. The Panel stated that "[a]lthough both sides maintain, albeit for somewhat different reasons, that the challenged measure is a safeguard measure within the scope of the Agreement on Safeguards, their arguments have led us to conclude, in discharging our duty to undertake 'an objective assessment of the matter', that we must examine this issue for ourselves, rather than simply proceeding on the basis of the parties' concurring positions". Having done so, the Panel concluded that "the specific duty at issue in this dispute is not a 'safeguard measure' within the meaning of Article 1 of the Agreement on Safeguards". [original emphasis; all italicized quotes below are also original emphasis.]

Definition of a "safeguards measure"

Article 1 of the Safeguards Agreement states in part that "safeguard measures" are "those measures provided for in Article XIX of GATT 1994". The Panel found that "the 'measures provided for' in Article XIX:1(a) are measures that suspend a GATT obligation and/or withdraw or modify a GATT concession, in situations where… a product 'is being imported' into a Member's territory in 'such increased quantities and under such conditions as to cause or threaten serious injury to domestic producers of like or directly competitive products'."

In the view of the Panel, "not any measure suspending, withdrawing or modifying a GATT obligation or concession will fall within the scope of Article XIX:1(a)". Instead, "it is only measures suspending, withdrawing, or modifying a GATT obligation or concession that a Member finds it must be temporarily released from in order to pursue a course of action necessary to prevent or remedy serious injury" that will constitute "safeguard measures". It added that "[i]n the absence of an obligation preventing a Member's remedial action, there would be obviously no need for that Member to be released from a WTO commitment and, therefore, nothing to "re-adjust temporarily'."

It followed, in the Panel's view, that "one of the defining features of the 'measures provided for' in Article XIX:1(a) (i.e. safeguard measures) is the suspension, withdrawal, or modification of a GATT obligation or concession that precludes a Member from imposing a measure to the extent necessary to prevent or remedy serious injury, in a situation where all of the conditions for the imposition of a safeguard measure are satisfied".

No Indonesian tariff commitments for the product at issue

The Panel recalled that "Indonesia has no binding tariff obligation with respect to galvalume in its WTO Schedule of Concessions", which meant that "Indonesia is free to impose any amount of duty it deems appropriate on imports of galvalume", including the specific duty at issue in this dispute. It added that "Indonesia's obligations under Article II of the GATT 1994 did not preclude the application of the specific duty on imports of galvalume, implying that the specific duty did not suspend, withdraw, or modify Indonesia's obligations under Article II of the GATT 1994".

Indonesia also argued in part that the imposition of the specific duty on imports of galvalume originating in its Regional Trade Agreement (RTA) partners (Korea, ASEAN) meant that the GATT obligation being suspended was the exception for RTAs under GATT Article XXIV. The Panel rejected this argument, finding that "Article XXIV of the GATT 1994 does not impose an obligation on Indonesia to apply a particular duty rate on imports of galvalume from its RTA partners" since Article XXIV is "a permissive provision, allowing Members to depart from their obligations under the GATT to establish a customs union and/or free trade area…" It concluded that "[t]here is, therefore, no basis for Indonesia's assertion that Article XXIV of the GATT 1994 precluded its authorities from raising tariffs on imports of galvalume and that the specific duty, thereby, 'suspended' 'the GATT exception under Article XXIV' for the purpose of Article XIX:1(a)".

Developing country exemption does not suspend MFN obligation for non-safeguard measures

Article 9.1 of the Safeguards Agreement provides in part that "[s]afeguard measures shall not be applied against a product originating in a developing country Member" as long as such imports remain below certain specified de minimis levels. Indonesia asserted that the specific duty suspended its MFN obligation under GATT Article I in order to comply with the special and differential treatment requirements of Article 9.1.

The Panel rejected this argument. It stated that "by its express terms, Article 9.1 is legally premised on an importing Member's intention to apply a safeguard measure". It added that "the fundamental prerequisite for the application of Article 9.1 does not exist, and there is, therefore, no basis for Indonesia's assertion that it was legally required to apply the specific duty in the manner required by Article 9.1". It added that "[i]n any case, even where a Member is proposing to apply a safeguard measure, it does not, in our view, follow from the fact that Article 9.1 imposes an obligation to apply a safeguard measure in a discriminatory manner in favour of qualifying imports from developing country Members, that the very same safeguard measure, because of that discrimination, suspends the obligation in Article I:1 to provide MFN-treatment for the purpose of Article XIX:1(a)".

The Panel offered two reasons for this conclusion. First, it stated "the discrimination that is called for by Article 9.1 (which would otherwise be inconsistent with Article I:1 of the GATT 1994) is not intended to prevent or remedy serious injury". Rather, "that discrimination is intended to leave producers from qualifying developing country Members with essentially the same access to the importing country market as existed prior to the imposition of a safeguard measure".

Second, it noted that that the General Interpretative Note to Annex 1A of the WTO Agreement states that in the event of a conflict between a provision of the GATT 1994 and a provision of another covered agreement, the provision of the covered agreement prevails to the extent of the conflict. In the Panel's view, "the effect of this rule is that the discriminatory application of a safeguard measure that is required by Article 9.1, to the extent it is inconsistent with the principle of MFN treatment, is permissible without having to suspend the operation of Article I:1 of the GATT 1994". It added that "the question of suspension simply does not arise in this context, because the obligation in Article 9.1 to exclude the qualifying imports of developing country Members from the scope of a safeguard measure prevails as a matter of law over the MFN obligation in Article I:1".

The Panel acknowledged that its conclusions on this issue were different from the ruling of the 2012 panel in Dominican Republic – Safeguard Measures, which found that "the discriminatory application of a safeguard measure in accordance with Article 9.1 of the Agreement on Safeguards resulted in the suspension of the importing Member's MFN obligations under Article I:1 of the GATT 1994". The current panel stated that it "respectfully disagree[d]" with that earlier ruling and affirmed that "the discriminatory application of a safeguard measure for the purpose of affording S&D pursuant to Article 9.1 does not result in a suspension of a Member's obligations under Article I:1, within the meaning of Article XIX:1(a) of the GATT 1994".

Safeguards investigation not determinative

The Panel next considered the fact that Indonesia's specific duty was imposed at the conclusion of a safeguards investigation, and was notified to the WTO Safeguards Committee. It found that "the fact that a Member initiated and conducted an investigation under its domestic safeguards legislation does not necessarily mean that the measures imposed on the investigated product at the end of that process are 'safeguard measures' within the meaning of Article XIX of the GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Safeguards". It stressed that "while a WTO-consistent investigation is a necessary prerequisite for the application of a WTO-consistent safeguard measure, the fact that an importing Member may have conducted an investigation in accordance with the Agreement on Safeguards does not mean that any measures adopted as a result of the conclusions in that investigation suspend, modify, or withdraw any GATT obligation or concession and, therefore, constitute 'safeguard measures' within the meaning of Article 1 of the Agreement on Safeguards".

The Panel stressed at the conclusion of its analysis that "our finding that the specific duty is not a 'safeguard measure' does not mean that Members are precluded from applying 'safeguard measures' on imports for which their tariffs are 'unbound'." Rather, "[a]ny WTO Member faced with such a situation would be entitled to exercise its rights under the Agreement on Safeguards to prevent or remedy serious injury to its domestic industry, provided that the chosen remedial course of action suspends, withdraws, or modifies a relevant GATT obligation or concession for that purpose".

"Stand alone" MFN challenge – Indonesia violated GATT Article I

The Panel then considered the claim that the exemption of 120 developing countries from the application of the specific duty violated Indonesia's MFN obligations under GATT Article I. The Panel noted that "[a]lthough the complainants pursue this claim primarily as part of their complaint against the specific duty as a safeguard measure, they also make the same claim on the basis of the same arguments against the specific duty as a stand-alone measure".

Indonesia did not contest the claim against the duty as a stand-alone measure. It noted that the exemption for developing countries was premised on the view that "the specific duty is a measure which, by definition, would be inconsistent with Article I:1 of the GATT, were it not considered to be a safeguard measure within the meaning of Article 1 of the Agreement on Safeguards". The Panel recalled that "[w]e have previously concluded that the specific duty does not constitute a safeguard measure".

GATT Article I provides in part that "any advantage, favour, privilege or immunity" granted by a Member in relation to "customs duties and charges" on the importation of "any product originating in … any other country shall be accorded immediately and unconditionally" to the like product originating in all Members. The Panel agreed with the complainants both that the specific duty was a "customs duty" and that the exclusion of imports of galvalume from the 120 developing countries "constitutes an 'advantage' granted to 'like products' that is not 'immediately and unconditionally accorded' to imports of galvalume from all WTO Members". The Panel therefore concluded that "the application of the specific duty on imports of galvalume originating in all but the 120 countries… is inconsistent with Indonesia's obligation to afford MFN treatment under Article I:1 of the GATT 1994".

Claims under Safeguards Agreement dismissed

In the final section of its report, the Panel considered the claims of the complainants under the Safeguards Agreement and GATT Article XIX. It stated that "[h]aving concluded that the specific duty is not a safeguard measure within the meaning of Article 1 of the Agreement on Safeguards, it is evident to us that there is no legal basis for the complainants' claims under the Agreement on Safeguards" and GATT Article XIX, and that "we dismiss the entirety of those claims". Given what the Panel called "the unique circumstances of this case", it "decided to proceed to address the complainants' claims, but only to the extent of identifying facts relevant to an evaluation of the allegations…, the conduct of its investigation, and Indonesia's decision to impose the specific duty". Although it examined those issues, the Panel expressly declined to "consider the legal merits of the complainants' claims" under these provisions.

The Report of the WTO Panel in IndonesiaSafeguard on Certain Iron or Steel Products, (WT/DS490/R, WT/DS496/R) was circulated on 18 August 2017.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© White & Case LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

White & Case LLP
Contact
more
less

White & Case LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.