The Situation: The Italian Parliament recently approved the Conversion Law of Decree no. 50, dealing with, among others, securitization regulations.
The Result: The Conversion Law expands the scope of the "Law 130 Vehicle" for the sale of certain securitized assets due to an insolvency or restructuring.
Looking Ahead: The new provisions should attract new investment and make it easier for banks and other financial intermediaries to dispose of nonperforming leases and other claims.
On June 15, 2017, the Italian Parliament approved the Conversion Law of Decree no. 50 of April 25, 2017 ("Conversion Law"). The Conversion Law includes a review of the legal framework applicable to Italian securitization transactions. The Conversion Law provides for significant changes aimed at attracting new investments and facilitating the disposal of distressed claims ("crediti deteriorati") (including nonperforming, unlikely to pay, and forborne claims) as well as financial lease receivables (and their residual value component) by Italian banks and financial intermediaries.
The Conversion Law will be published in the Italian Official Gazette shortly and likely will become effective the following day.
Below is a brief summary of the most significant changes set out in the Conversion Law.
Some of the proposed changes entail a legal recognition of the so-called "ReoCo" schemes. Such schemes usually are implemented by investors in securitization transactions to maximize profits with respect to those collateral assets that offer a potential upside, to the extent they are managed, refurbished, and/or sold out of insolvency and/or enforcement proceedings.
In a nutshell, a special purpose vehicle company ("AssetCo") may be set up in the context of a securitization transaction governed by the Italian Securitization Law ("Law 130 Vehicle") to manage the assets and/or the security package used as collateral in relation to the receivables being securitized.
In addition, AssetCo must:
The proceeds arising from the management and/or disposal of the assets owned by AssetCo due by it to the Law 130 Vehicle are destinated by law exclusively to the satisfaction of the noteholders' claims vis à vis the Law 130 Vehicle under the securitization transaction and to the payment of the relevant transaction costs.
If the pool of assets assigned to AssetCo in connection with the securitization of lease receivables includes, in addition to the leased assets, the leasing agreements or the legal relationships resulting from the termination of such agreements:
These changes provide for a fronting structure, based on the Law 130 Vehicle/AssetCo scheme, which allows nonbanking/financial institutions to invest in nonperforming financial leases. The Law 130 Vehicle purchases the claims (no other rights or assets can be acquired by the Law 130 Vehicle) while the AssetCo purchases the residual portion of the agreements (or related rights upon termination) and the underlying assets, with the intent of managing and liquidating them and transfering the relevant proceeds to the Law 130 Vehicle.
The Conversion Law specifies that any proceeds deriving from the management or disposal of the assets by the AssetCo are as a matter of law segregated in favor of the Law 130 Vehicle's relevant noteholders. This substantially mitigates the insolvency risk of the AssetCo, addressing one of the main concerns of nonfinancial entities when investing in this asset class.
The above scheme applies only to: (i) so-called "crediti deteriorati," with the goal of supporting the nonperforming leases ("NPLs") disposal processes; and (ii) NPLs originated by banks or financial institutions with a registered office in Italy—thereby excluding those sales made by branches of EU banks. This latter restriction does not seem to respond to any specific regulatory or legal requirements, and it will need to be better analyzed from the perspective of its compliance with the principles of EC Law.
Investing in this asset class is made more efficient by the application of the favorable tax regime (namely, transfer taxes) applicable to transfers of assets by financial leasing companies to transfers made by AssetCo, as well as by segregation of proceeds deriving from the sale of assets made by AssetCo in favor of noteholders.
The Conversion Law opens the possibility for Law 130 Vehicles to grant rescue financing to distressed debtors to the extent that it may actually improve the recoverability of the receivables included in the securitized portfolio and the turnaround of the relevant distressed debtors. However, the relevant lending activity by the Law 130 Vehicles is subject to the involvement of a bank or a so-called Section 106 financial intermediary, which must also retain a significant economic interest (i.e., at least 5 percent) in the securitization. If the financing is granted in the context of insolvency or restructuring proceedings (such as a debt restructuring agreement or composition with debtors proceedings), no "skin in the game" apparently is required. This is probably because those financing transactions would take place in the context of court-supervised proceedings.
With regard to insolvency and restructuring proceedings (such as debt restructuring agreements and composition with debtors proceedings), Law 130 Vehicles may acquire or subscribe for, as applicable, shares, quotas, and/or other participating financial instruments deriving from debt to equity swap transactions.
Purchase on a Cherry-Picking Basis
The Conversion Law introduces the possibility for Law 130 Vehicle to purchase nonperforming claims on a cherry-picking basis (instead of the traditional transfer of the bulk of receivables to be selected on objective eligibility criteria), substantially taking advantage of the same simplified formalities provided for portfolios' acquisitions and trade receivables.
Four Key Takeaways