On September 11, 2020, U.S. Representatives Bill Foster (D-IL), John Katko (R-NY), Jim Langevin (D-RI), and Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) introduced H.R. 8215, the Improving Digital Identity Act of 2020 (“the Act”) to address the rising problem of identity fraud.
In its findings section, the Act highlights the increasing prevalence and problem of data security incidents and identity fraud. In 2019, over 164 million consumer records containing personally identifiable information were affected in the U.S. by data security incident, with identity fraud losses approaching $17 billion. Citing the inadequacy of current digital identity solutions, the Act seeks to address the pressing rise of identity fraud by:
1) Creating an “Improving Digital Identity Task Force” (“the Task Force”) that would serve as a coordinated governmentwide effort aimed at protecting individual privacy;
2) Directing the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) to create new standards to guide government agencies when providing digital identity services; and
3) Establishing within the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) a grant program to provide funding for States to upgrade systems that provide drivers’ licenses and other types of identity credentials to support the development of highly secure, interoperable State systems that enable digital identity verification.
The Task Force:
The interdisciplinary Task Force would sit within the Executive Office of the President and comprise senior federal, state, and local officials, including the Secretaries of Treasury, Homeland Security, State, and Education; Directors of the Office of Management and Budget and NIST; Commissioner of the Social Security Administration; and Administrator of General Services (or their designees), as well as five State and five local government officials who represent agencies that issue identity credentials and who have knowledge of the systems used to provide such credentials. The Task Force’s mandate would be to:
Under the legislation, the Task Force would be required to publish recommendations within 180 days of enactment regarding: priorities for research and development in the systems that enable digital identity verification; and the standards-based architecture to be developed by NIST.
NIST Framework of Standards:
The Act would require the Director of NIST to develop a framework of standards, methodologies, procedures, and processes as a guide for Federal, State, and local governments to follow when providing services related to digital identity verification. In developing the framework, the NIST Director would be required to consider methods to protect the privacy of individuals; security needs; and the needs of potential end-users and individuals that will use services related to digital identity verifications.
Department of Homeland Security Grants:
No later than 18 months after enactment of the Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security would be required to award grants to States to upgrade systems that provide drivers’ licenses and other types of identity credentials to support the development of highly secure, interoperable State systems that enable digital identity verification. A State that receives a grant would be required to use grant funds for services related to digital identity verification using the NIST Framework. A grant recipient also would be required to use not less than 10 percent of grant funds to provide services that assist individuals with obtaining identity credentials or identity verification services needed to obtain a driver’s license or State identity cards. The Act further would require the Secretary of Homeland Security to issue binding operational directives to Federal agencies for implementing the required NIST guidelines and the Office of Management and Budget’s May 21, 2019 memorandum on ‘‘Enabling Mission Delivery through Improved Identity, Credential, and Access Management.’’
Potential Impacts of the Bill:
If enacted, the Act would encourage Federal, State, and local governments to upgrade their identity privacy infrastructures. Responsive governments likely would begin by offering new forms of digital identification to supplement or even replace commonly used digital identifiers such as social security numbers to comply with the NIST framework. Of course, for new forms of digital identification to have a meaningful impact, they would need to be interoperable and adopted by a critical mass of states. To that end, DHS grants offered under the Act would be instrumental in getting the program off the ground and helping to achieve this necessary critical mass.
If new forms of digital identification are adopted as recommended by the framework, the impact on consumer data security could be significant. The advancement of digital identification solutions promises increased security by offering a more trustworthy source of identification for online transactions. Some countries already have implemented digital identification systems that rely on biometric information. While using biometric information as a form of government issued identification may be unpalatable for some U.S. consumers, less invasive forms of digital identification, such as digital trails, may provide an appropriate level of security without sacrificing privacy. The additional security offered by digital identification also could help reduce the overall risk and severity of data breaches and identity fraud.
Road to Passage:
With commerce and financial transactions increasingly being conducted online due to the COVID-19 public health emergency, it is ideal timing for innovations in digital identification solutions. The sponsors of H.R. 8215 have taken a positive and bipartisan step forward in Congress’ attempt to address the problem of identity fraud. The bill’s introduction this late in the current Congress likely will preclude any meaningful consideration this year, particularly in view of the abbreviated legislative calendar and focus on the 2020 elections. Another complicating factor stems from the fact that the bill was referred to three different committees for consideration due to jurisdictional overlap. That said, the legislation is an important marker and the issue of digital identification is likely to remain top of mind for some time. Indeed, the bill’s sponsors have already indicated their intention to reintroduce the measure at the start of the 117th Congress next year.