Legal Alert: Minnesota Supreme Court Finds In-House Lawyer Not Protected by State Whistleblower Law

FordHarrison
Contact

The Minnesota Supreme Court, in a 5 to 4 decision, ruled on Thursday that an in-house lawyer, who was terminated after reporting unlawful activity to his employer, was not protected by the state's whistleblower statute. By affirming the Court of Appeals, the Court effectively overturned the plaintiff's $197,000 jury award, not inclusive of costs and attorney's fees. See Kidwell v. Sybaritic, Inc., Case Nos. A07-584, A07-788 (June 24, 2010).

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

FordHarrison
Contact
more
less

FordHarrison on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide