Two 2011 U.S. Supreme Court Rulings Expand Employer Liability For Employment Discrimination

Allen Matkins
Contact

The employer's best defenses are always careful investigations, with accurate and detailed evaluations and write-ups. A focused follow-up after listening to the employee's specific complaint is suggested.

Third-Party Discrimination Complaints Get New Life

Complaint causes fiancé's discharge

Lawsuits involving office romances are rarely a good thing for employers. In January of this year, the U.S. Supreme Court [1] decided that firing an employee who was the fiancé of a female employee who filed a discrimination claim was a form of illegal retaliation. Eric Thompson and his fiancée, Miriam Regalado, were both employed at a Kentucky plant. Three weeks after Regalado filed a discrimination claim, her fiancé was fired. Not unnaturally, the Court reasoned that employees would be hesitant to file a discrimination claim if they knew their fiancé or family member would be fired as a result.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide