U.S. Supreme Court: No More Partial Institution Practice In AIA Reviews

Jones Day
Contact

In a win for SAS Institute, represented by Jones Day attorneys Greg Castanias, John Marlott, and Dave Cochran, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, No. 16-969, __ U.S. __ (2018), this morning.  The SAS decision rejects the Federal Circuit’s affirmation of the PTAB’s practice of instituting IPR on less than all claims challenged in a petition for IPR. Slip op. at 14.  The Court rejects this practice, “Because everything in the statute before us confirms that SAS is entitled to a final written decision addressing all of the claims it has challenged and nothing suggests we lack the power to say so, the judgment of the Federal Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

A full analysis and report on the Supreme Court’s decision in SAS Institute is forthcoming.

 

Written by:

Jones Day
Contact
more
less

Jones Day on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide