District of South Dakota: Denying a Claim for Reasons Known to be False is Not a Reasonable Basis to Deny a Claim

by Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP

Lewison v. W. Nat’l Mut. Ins. Co., Civ. No. 13-4031-KES, 2014 WL 3573403 (D.S.D. July 21, 2014).

The District of South Dakota grants in part and denies in part an insurer’s motion for summary judgment on two plaintiffs’ bad faith claims, where one plaintiff’s entitlement to benefits was “fairly debatable” at the time of the denial and the other plaintiff’s claim was denied for reasons the insurer knew to be false.

            Clinton and Beverly Lewison (the “Lewisons”) were involved in an automobile accident on August 24, 2010.  The other driver in the accident was entirely at fault.  Neither of the Lewisons went to the hospital immediately after the accident, but both sought medical care shortly thereafter.  Mr. Lewison attended physical therapy for knee, shoulder, back, hip, and neck pain, and also received chiropractic care.  Due to persistent knee pain, Mr. Lewison saw an orthopedist on December 22, 2010, and had total knee replacement surgery on February 14, 2011.  He continued to attend physical therapy until March 31, 2011.  Mrs. Lewison also attended physical therapy and received chiropractic care following the accident.  She completed all treatment on January 6, 2011.             

            The Lewisons were insured by Western National Mutual Insurance Company (“Western National”).  Western National was notified of the accident on the day it happened.  The motorist who caused the accident had a policy with another insurance company with policy limits of $25,000 per person.  The at-fault driver’s insurer offered to settle with the Lewisons for the full amount of the policy.  Western National advised the Lewisons’ attorney that the Lewisons were free to agree to this settlement.  After settling with the driver, the Lewisons submitted underinsured motorist (“UIM”) claims to Western National.  Western National paid each of the Lewisons $5,000 toward medical expenses but denied their UIM claims. 

            Western National based its denial of Mr. Lewison’s UIM claim on an independent medical examination (“IME”) conducted by an orthopedic surgeon.  The doctor who performed the IME concluded that Mr. Lewison’s knee injury was not caused by the accident and that he would have needed a knee replacement in any event.  As to Mrs. Lewison, Western Mutual determined that she had fully recovered from all injuries caused by the accident and that the $30,000 she had received was sufficient to cover the entirety of the damages she suffered.

            Following the denial of their UIM claims, the Lewisons filed suit against Western National for breach of contract.  The parties were able to reach an agreement under which Western National paid Mr. Lewison the limits of his UIM coverage, $75,000, and paid Mrs. Lewison $30,000 on her claim.  After entering into the agreement, the Lewisons filed suit in the District of South Dakota alleging bad faith for Western National’s denial of the UIM claims.  Western National moved for summary judgment on both of the bad faith claims.           

            The court denied the motion for summary judgment as to Mr. Lewison, but granted summary judgment in Western National’s favor on Mrs. Lewison’s bad faith claim.  The court explained that bad faith would only be found where there was a lack of a reasonable basis for the denial of policy benefits.  Further, if an insured’s claim was “fairly debatable” either in fact or law, the insurer would not be found to have acted in bad faith. 

            As to Mr. Lewison, the court noted that Western National’s denial was based on the IME’s conclusion that Mr. Lewison did not complain of any knee pain until several months after the accident.  The court found that Western National knew this assertion was false, because it had a copy of Mr. Lewison’s medical records.  Moreover, in its request for the IME, Western National told the examining orthopedist that Mr. Lewison complained of knee pain as early as three days after the accident.  Western National argued that it would have denied Mr. Lewison’s claim regardless of when he first complained about his knee.  The court, however, rejected this argument, reasoning that an insurer who denies a claim for reasons known to be false cannot be said to have had a “reasonable basis” for denying the claim.  Accordingly, there was a triable issue of fact as to whether Western National had reasonably denied the claim and the motion for summary judgment was denied.

            Unlike Mr. Lewison’s claim, the court found that whether Mrs. Lewison was entitled to UIM benefits was fairly debatable at the time her claim was denied.  Mrs. Lewison argued that Western National acted in bad faith by failing to interview her or speak with any of her treating physicians prior to denying her claim.  The court rejected this argument, noting that when Western National requested an examination under oath, Mrs. Lewison’s counsel refused and accused the company of bad faith conduct.  Moreover, Western National had total access to Mrs. Lewison’s medical records, which indicated that she was doing well at the time she stopped receiving treatment.  The court emphasized that while Western Mutual could have spoken to Mrs. Lewison’s physicians in addition to reviewing her records, the law requires an insurer’s investigation of a claim to be reasonable, not perfect.  Because Western Mutual acted reasonably and the question of whether Mrs. Lewison was entitled to UIM benefits was fairly debatable, Western Mutual was entitled to summary judgment on her bad faith claim.     


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.