Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC

Contact
Share
Info
5445 Corporate Dr
Suite 200
Troy, MI 48098, United States
Phone: (248) 641-1600
Fax: (248) 641-0270
Areas of Practice
  • Appellate Practice
  • Intellectual Property
  • International Law & Trade
  • Litigation
  • Science, Computers, & Tech
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • Michigan
  • Missouri
  • Texas
  • Virginia
Number of Attorneys
100+ Attorneys

Happy 209th Birthday, President Lincoln

February 12 was Abraham Lincoln’s birthday, which, not that long ago, warranted its own holiday. Abraham Lincoln is the only president to earn a patent..…more
 /  Elections & Politics, Intellectual Property

Board’s Obvious Analysis Improperly Relied Upon Hindsight

In Polaris Industries, Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc., [2016-1807, 2016-2280] (February 9, 2018), the Federal Circuit affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded the PTAB’s determination in an IPR that claims of U.S. Patent No…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

ANDA Your Patent is Not Infringed

In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, [2017-1560] (February 9, 2018), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court finding that it did not abuse its discretion in denying Merck’s request for additional…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Process Limitations are Presumed to Impart Structural Limitations, Even Where it is not Clear What those Limitations Are

In In re Nordt Development Co., LLC, [2017-1445] (February 8, 2018), the Federal Circuit rejected the Board’s claim construction of “injection molded” as a process limitation with no patentable weight, vacated the Board’s…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Walker Process Monopolization Claim Does not Depend upon Resolution of a Substantial Question of Federal Patent Law

In Xitronix Corp. v. Kla-Tencor Corp., [2016-2746] (February 9, 2018), the Federal Circuit transferred an appeal of a Walker Process claim to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which has appellate…more
 /  Administrative Law, Business Torts, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

#GoldMedalEnforcement

Tonight is the start of the 23rd Winter Olympic Games in Pyeongchang, South Korea. For the next month, people will cheer and support their country’s athletes as they engage in physical feats that seem to defy human limitations. …more
 /  Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law, Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property

Trademark Law Offers Scant Protection When Bad Things “Happen” to Good Marks

There was a lot of discussion recently about the episode of NBC’s This Is Us, which implicated a faulty switch on a Crockpot® in the death of the family’s beloved patriarch, Jack Pearson. The manufacturers opened a Twitter…more
 /  Art, Entertainment, & Sports Law, Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property

Another 101 Bites The Dust

In DCT Move, Inc. v. Real Estate Alliance, the CAFC affirmed the district court’s holding of invalidity of claims under 101. Here is the representative claim…more
 /  Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Incorporation by Reference (May Have) Saved the Day

In Paice LLC v. Ford Motor Company, [2017-1387, 2017-1388, 2017-1390, 2017-1457, 2017-1458, 2017-1406] (February 1, 2018), the Federal Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded Final Written decisions of the PTAB…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

App Display Given the OK (Under 101)

On January 25, 2018, the CAFC affirmed a district court’s denial of a motion for summary judgment for invalidity under 101 in Core Wireless Licensing v. LG Electronics, Inc, and found the claims to be directed to patent eligible…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Second and Third Bites at the Apple; Subsequent IPR Losses undo IPR Win

In Maxlinear, Inc. v. CF Crespe LLC, [2017-1039] (January 25, 2018), the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the PTAB’s determination that dependent claims were not unpatentable in view of the Federal Circuit’s intervening…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Computer Interface Was Not an Abstract Idea

In Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc., [2016-2684, 2017-1922] (January 25, 2018), the Federal Circuit affirmed the denial of summary judgment that, (1) claims 8 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 8,713,476 and claims…more
 /  Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Drag Things Out? Disclaimer Creates Estoppel.

In Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., [2017-1239] (January 24, 2018), the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board’s entry of an adverse judgment pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b) in an IPR after patent owner Arthrex disclaimed all…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Design Patent Damages — Four New Factors for Making the Determination

The Northern District of California has asked the parties in the everlasting Apple v. Samsung Electronics design patent litigation (No. 11-01846) to consider four new factors in arguing whether Apple’s approximately $400 million…more
 /  Civil Remedies, Intellectual Property

At The Bench: Patent Law 2017 Takeaways

Viability of Diagnostic Method Claims - Problem: It has become increasingly difficult to fend off validity challenges when asserting diagnostic method claims. Claims directed to methods of determining risk or disease states…more
 /  Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade
Showing 1-15 of 1013 Results
/
View per page
Page: of 68
This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.