News & Analysis as of

Alice/Mayo Patent Prosecution Machine Learning

Baker Botts L.L.P.

A New Playbook for § 101? The USPTO's Guidance on Using Technical Evidence

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

Section 101 eligibility remains one of the most unpredictable and frequently contested areas of U.S. patent practice, particularly for software, artificial intelligence, and machine learning....more

Fish & Richardson

PTAB Reverses § 101 Rejection Under Desjardins Framework

Fish & Richardson on

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has issued a decision in an ex parte appeal reversing an examiner’s final rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 101 of claims directed to artificial intelligence (AI) based business methods. Ex...more

International Lawyers Network

The Recent Expansion of Patent Eligibility for AI Inventions Before the USPTO

Introduction - The new United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director John A. Squires was sworn in on September 22, 2025 and wasted no time that week in expanding patent eligibility for AI related inventions. In...more

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

USPTO Outlines New Path for Overcoming § 101 Rejections Through Rule 132 Subject Matter Eligibility Declarations

Lowenstein Sandler LLP on

What’s New: USPTO Embraces Evidence-Driven § 101 Practice - The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued two coordinated memoranda explaining how applicants can use Subject Matter Eligibility Declarations...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Hottest Patent Term of 2026? SMED.

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Every year has its “it” term.In 2025, the crown belonged to AI, and rightfully so. AI dominated the headlines, flooded the USPTO’s dockets, and triggered more §101 rejections than any examiner would care to admit. If you...more

ArentFox Schiff

SMEDs in the Spotlight: USPTO Memo Highlights Use of Rule 132 Declarations for § 101

ArentFox Schiff on

On December 4, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a memorandum to the Patent Examining Corps reinforcing its existing subject matter eligibility framework under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and calling renewed attention to...more

Venable LLP

The § 101 Reset for 2026

Venable LLP on

Patent practitioners have seen a shifting landscape for patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 since the Supreme Court’s 2012 and 2014 seminal decisions in Mayo and Alice. Now, the United States Patent and Trademark Office...more

BakerHostetler

Shifting Views on Section 101 and AI under Director Squires

BakerHostetler on

In a rare procedural move, the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO) director-convened Appeals Review Panel (ARP) recently vacated a § 101 rejection that had been introduced by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...more

ArentFox Schiff

Landmark Patent Appeal Decision Strengthens Protection for AI and Machine Learning Innovations

ArentFox Schiff on

A significant Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision authored by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) leadership, including the new USPTO Director John A. Squires, signals the importance of artificial...more

ArentFox Schiff

USPTO Aims to Boost Patent Eligibility of AI and ML Inventions

ArentFox Schiff on

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued new guidance to clarify and improve the evaluation of patent eligibility for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) inventions in order to foster...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide