News & Analysis as of

Alice/Mayo Patent Prosecution New Guidance

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

USPTO Outlines New Path for Overcoming § 101 Rejections Through Rule 132 Subject Matter Eligibility Declarations

Lowenstein Sandler LLP on

What’s New: USPTO Embraces Evidence-Driven § 101 Practice - The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued two coordinated memoranda explaining how applicants can use Subject Matter Eligibility Declarations...more

Foley Hoag LLP

Guidance on Rule 132 Declarations for Patent Eligibility

Foley Hoag LLP on

Key Takeaways - Easier path to eligibility: The USPTO’s new guidance explains how to use sworn statements (SMEDs) to provide facts showing an invention is eligible for a patent....more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

USPTO Puts Subject Matter Eligibility Declarations in the Spotlight

On December 4, 2025, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director John Squires issued two memoranda addressing subject matter eligibility and spotlighting an additional pathway to overcome a rejection under 35 U.S.C. §...more

Venable LLP

The § 101 Reset for 2026

Venable LLP on

Patent practitioners have seen a shifting landscape for patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 since the Supreme Court’s 2012 and 2014 seminal decisions in Mayo and Alice. Now, the United States Patent and Trademark Office...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide