News & Analysis as of

Apportionment Patent Litigation Corporate Counsel

Haug Partners LLP

$10 Million Jury Award Reduced to $1 by Delaware District Court following JMOL Motion in Rex v. Intuitive: Federal Circuit Affirms

Haug Partners LLP on

In Rex Medical, L.P., v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (“Rex”), the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s reduction of a jury award from $10 million to $1. At trial, with no damages experts testifying, a jury awarded $10...more

White & Case LLP

Federal Circuit Says Where Expert Evidence is Insufficient, Patent Damages Can Be Nominal

White & Case LLP on

On October 2, 2025, in Rex Medical, LP v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Nos. 2024-1072, 2024-1125, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's preclusion of Rex's patent damages expert from...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Can’t Hide Behind Minor Clerical Error to Escape Willful Infringement Verdict

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court decision correcting a clerical error in a claim. Pavo Solutions LLC v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc., Case Nos. 21-1834 (Fed. Cir. June 3, 2022)...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

One for All, and All for One . . . Except When It Comes to Patent License Comparability

Examining whether portfolio patent licenses can be sufficiently comparable to a single-patent license for the purposes of supporting a patent damages verdict, a split panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide