News & Analysis as of

CA Supreme Court › Enforceability

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

California Supreme Court Warns That Confidentiality Agreements May Undermine Arbitration Agreements

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

When Confidentiality Clauses Undermine Arbitration Agreements - In Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc., --- P.3d --- (Cal. Feb. 2, 2026), the California Supreme Court issued an important decision for employers who seek to...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Arbitration Agreement’s Illegible Print Not Automatically Invalid as Unfair

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The California Supreme Court held in Fuentes v. Empire Nissan, Inc. (Feb. 2, 2026) that small or blurry print in an arbitration agreement does not automatically invalidate the agreement as unconscionable. Instead, the Court...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

California Supreme Court Issues Pro-Arbitration Agreement Decision

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

On March 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of California issued another ruling on the enforceability of arbitration agreements. In Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc. (S208345), the court considered the enforceability of an arbitration...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide