The Role of an Expert Witness
Law School Toolbox Podcast Episode 539: Listen and Learn -- Impeachment (Part 1)
Podcast - Reading the Room
Identifying Good and Bad Use Cases for AI for Law Firms
Show and Tell
Law School Toolbox Podcast Episode 532: Listen and Learn -- Criminal Procedure: Identifications (Part 2)
Key Discovery Points: If You’re Planning to Submit GenAI Deepfake Evidence, Make Sure It’s Believable
Podcast - Telling the Whole Story
Law School Toolbox Podcast Episode 530: Listen and Learn -- Criminal Procedure: Identifications (Part 1)
Key Discovery Points: Stay Aware of the Bundled Metadata in Digital Photos!
Podcast - Clarity Over Complexity at Trial
Hollywood Overruled: Real Lessons from Cinematic Litigation – Speaking of Litigation Video Podcast
Key Discovery Points: Think About Who Has Control Over a Hyperlinked File
5 Key Takeaways | Faulty Intelligence: Responding to an AI Incident
Podcast - Bad Facts Make Bad Law
Podcast - Actors on a Stage
Bar Exam Toolbox Podcast Episode 322: Listen and Learn -- Criminal Procedure: Identifications (Part 2)
Podcast - Too Dirty for Dirty Crime
Just Press "Play"
Key Discovery Points: Be a Team Player When It Comes to Production
Recently, United States District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein accepted in part the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo. A detailed summary of Judge Figueredo’s decision was the subject of a prior...more
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed an exclusion of expert testimony and grant of judgment as a matter of law, finding that the district court improperly conflated admissibility with credibility and...more
In Regents of the University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc., the Federal Circuit addressed the issue of conception and reduction to practice as related to the written description of multiple patent applications. ...more
The Federal Circuit’s ongoing struggle over how aggressively district courts should police expert testimony has once again divided the court, exposing a fundamental disagreement about the proper limits of Rule 702....more
Pharmaceutical companies generate vast data during drug development and regulatory processes, making eDiscovery complex due to data volume, sensitivity, and compliance. Efficient eDiscovery solutions are essential to manage...more
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a mixed ruling in a dispute over patents covering child car seat technology, explaining that infringement under the doctrine of equivalents requires an equivalent for...more
This week’s Case of the Week includes a potpourri of issues following a jury trial and issuance of a permanent injunction against Evenflo based on patents directed to child car seats....more
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that the plaintiff failed to prove misappropriation of five alleged trade secrets related to self-inflating tire...more
On November 18, 2025, District Judge Lewis J. Liman (S.D.N.Y.) denied Plaintiff Lashify, Inc.’s (“Lashify”) motion to hold Defendants Qingdao Network Technology Co., Ltd., d/b/a UCoolMe (“Qingdao”) and Vivicute Limited in...more
A recent decision by the Milan Central Division (CD) of 23 October 2025 could create further obstacles for prior art submissions, highlighting the growing focus on procedural efficiency in patent litigation before the Unified...more
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court’s construction of a claim, finding that the plain and ordinary meaning of a disputed term was redefined by the patentee under principles of...more
Nature of the Case and Issue(s) Presented: Novartis holds the NDA for Entresto, a drug used to treat heart failure, having the active ingredients sacubitril and valsartan. The ’918 patent is not an Orange Book-listed patent...more
FINESSE WIRELESS LLC v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC - Before Moore, Linn, and Cunningham. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Unclear and internally inconsistent expert testimony was not...more
On October 2, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Judges Dyk, Prost, and Stoll) (“Federal Circuit”) affirmed the District of Delaware’s judgment in a patent infringement action holding that Rex...more
On October 2, 2025, in Rex Medical, LP v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Nos. 2024-1072, 2024-1125, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's preclusion of Rex's patent damages expert from...more
The Federal Court of Australia has clarified when a successful patentee must make an election for pecuniary relief in Vehicle Monitoring Systems Pty Ltd (VMS) v SARB Management Group Pty Ltd (SARB) (No 13) [2025] FCA 1078....more
Federal Circuit decisions applying the new standards for design-patent obviousness continue to inform how patent challengers should frame their plans of attack, both in the PTAB and in the courts. In Dynamite Marketing, Inc....more
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed jury verdicts of infringement, finding that they were not supported by substantial evidence because of deficiencies in the patent owner’s expert testimony. Finesse...more
Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, Appeal No. 2024-1039 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 24, 2025) - In our Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit struck down a $166.3 million damages award against AT&T and Nokia of America Corp.,...more
On Wednesday, September 24, the Federal Circuit set aside a $166.3 million patent infringement verdict in Finesse Wireless LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, 24-1039 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 24, 2025). The Court held that the jury’s verdict...more
Magēmā Technology LLC v. Phillips 66, No. 24-1342 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 8, 2025) - On September 8, 2025, the Federal Circuit reversed and remanded a judgment in Magēmā Technology LLC v. Phillips 66, which held that the district...more
In Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed in part a district court ruling that had held Sonos’s “Zone Scene” patents unenforceable due to prosecution laches. The Federal Circuit...more
On September 16, 2025, acting USPTO Director Coke Morgan Stewart released a memo instructing the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that if the Board is considering claims that have “already been adjudicated” before the...more
The Federal Circuit’s analyzed proper jury verdict form procedures and evidentiary rules in the context of LTE standard-essential patent litigation between Optis and Apple. The Court addressed the intersection of jury...more
Plaintiff Magēmā Technology LLC (“Magēmā”) sued Phillips 66, Phillips 66 Co., and WRB Refining LP (together, “Phillips”) asserting two patents related to making residual heavy marine fuel oil (“HMFO”) with low sulfur content....more