News & Analysis as of

Patent Act CAFC

Morgan Lewis

District Courts Deepen Divide Over Design Patent Profit Disgorgement for Section 289 Damages

Morgan Lewis on

Federal courts continue to grapple with whether profit disgorgement for design patent infringement is a legal remedy for juries or an equitable remedy for judges, an issue the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Claim Construction: Indefinite or Clerical Error?

This Federal Circuit opinion analyzes the “very demanding standard” of judicial correction of erroneous wording of a patent claim. Background - Canatex Completion Solutions owns U.S. Patent No. 10,794,122. This patent...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Complete inventive entity required to avoid “by another” prior art under pre-AIA § 102(e)

McDermott Will & Schulte on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial & Appeal Board’s decision finding claims directed to cladribine regimens for treating multiple sclerosis unpatentable as obvious....more

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs, LLC

Amgen Ratifies CAFC’s Requirement to Enable a Claim’s Full Scope

The Court’s reasoning in Amgen v. Sanofi upholds the Federal Circuit’s long-standing requirement to enable the full scope of a claimed invention. Since the Patent Act of 1790, patent law has required describing inventions...more

Jenner & Block

Client Alert: Supreme Court Affirms High Enablement Bar for Drug Patents

Jenner & Block on

On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court affirmed the Federal Circuit’s (CAFC) decision on enablement in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, 987 F.3d 1080 (CA Fed. 2021). The Court thus left in place a significant decision making it more...more

Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.

In Qualcomm v. Apple, Federal Circuit Rules Out Applicant Admitted Prior Art As the “Basis” for Inter Partes Review

On the first of February, in Qualcomm Inc. v. Apple Inc., the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“the CAFC”) vacated and remanded the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) on two inter partes review (“IPR”)...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Court Decision Means that Antibody Patenting Is Not Getting Easier

Patenting antibodies has long been challenging. Although most inventions can be patented based on their functionality, assuming the functionality is new and non-obvious, for antibodies and other biomolecules there is a higher...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide