News & Analysis as of

Trademark Opposition Proceedings

K&L Gates LLP

Oh My Word(le), New York Times Succeeds in Invalidating UK WORDLE Trade Mark Without a UK Trade Mark of Its Own

K&L Gates LLP on

A significant risk that brands fear is that others may file their trade mark first in a new market, as most trade mark systems operate under a ‘first to file’ approach. Brands can therefore be comforted by the UK Intellectual...more

Knobbe Martens

No Joy in Mudville: Federal Circuit Affirms Aaron Judge and MLBBPA’s Priority in Marks All Rise and Here Comes the Judge Based on...

Knobbe Martens on

Today, Aaron Judge (“Judge”) is a household name for sports fans across the United States. However, in 2017, Judge was just entering the Major League Baseball scene and carving out a name for himself—he won Rookie of the Year...more

DLA Piper

Innovation Law Insights - February 2026

DLA Piper on

Legal Break - What’s new in the Digital Omnibus? In this episode of Legal Break, Alessandro Ferrari from DLA Piper takes a closer look at the Digital Omnibus and the main changes and simplification measures it...more

Hogan Lovells

From monkeying around to legal certainty: the CJEU speaks

Hogan Lovells on

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has now brought an end to the uncertainty surrounding the temporal assessment of earlier rights in EU trade mark proceedings. In its judgment, the CJEU has set aside the...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court confirms test for leave to file new evidence in appeal from Opposition Board Decision

Smart & Biggar on

As of April 1, 2025, subsection 56(5) of the Trademarks Act requires parties to obtain leave to file additional evidence on appeal from decisions of the Registrar of Trademarks (the “Registrar”), which include decisions of...more

International Lawyers Network

Australian Trade Mark Update: Key Changes to the Trade Mark Regulations for 2026

Jessica Bell, Associate, Kalus Kenny Intelex, Melbourne, Australia 2026 begins with a number of changes to the Australian Trade Marks landscape, following the introduction of the Trade Marks Amendment (International...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian trademark law 2025: a year in review

Smart & Biggar on

2025 marked a year of adaptive reform in Canadian trademark law. Decisions, legislative updates, CIPO initiatives, and procedural enhancements collectively show the system continuing to mature in the wake of the 2019...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

All rise: Here comes the real judge

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sustained the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board’s refusal to register trademark applications (over oppositions) for two character marks and a design mark based on the Board’s...more

Brooks Kushman P.C.

What’s In a Name? The Strategic Value of Strong Trademarks

Brooks Kushman P.C. on

“What’s in a name?” That which we call a good, by any other name, would it be as valuable? Conceiving a trademark is much like crafting a poem – it should be original, distinctive, and memorable. Like Shakespeare’s language,...more

Hogan Lovells

China releases near‑final draft trademark law: What’s about to change?

Hogan Lovells on

On 27 December 2025, the Standing Committee of China's National People's Congress released the Draft Amendment to the Trademark Law of the PRC for public comment. Comments from stakeholders are due by 10 February 2026, and...more

Knobbe Martens

Trademark & Brand Protection Update | December 2025

Knobbe Martens on

In the world of designer toys, few characters have captured hearts, and consumer sales, quite like Labubu. Created by artist Kasing Lung, and popularized by Chinese company Pop Mart, Labubu is part of “The Monsters” series –...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Affirms LeBron’s Priority in Marks I AM MORE THAN AN ATHLETE Based on Valid Assignment of Common Law Rights

Knobbe Martens on

Game Plan, Inc. (“Game Plan”), a nonprofit organization that supports student‑athletes in underserved communities, appealed a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) to the Federal Circuit (see Game Plan,...more

Miller Johnson

Priority Through Assignment: Federal Circuit Validates Mid-Opposition Acquisition of Common Law Trademark Rights

Miller Johnson on

Game Plan, Inc. v. Uninterrupted IP, LLC, No. 2024-1407, 2025 WL 3534330 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2025) - On December 10, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”)’s decision to cancel Game...more

Knobbe Martens

(Intend To) Use It or Lose It: Proving Bona Fide Intent Before the TTAB

Knobbe Martens on

In a precedential opinion issued in September 2025, the TTAB sustained the opposition of the mark, HOTEL EL ROBLAR, for hotel services in class 43, agreeing with the opposer that the applicant lacked bona fide intent to use...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Game plan backfires: Mark cancelled

McDermott Will & Schulte on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board’s cancellation of a registration and dismissal of registrant’s opposition, finding that the cancellation petitioner had priority...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Say Thank You with Chocolate: MERCI and DANKE Not Confusingly Similar, Says the TTAB

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Merci, Danke, and Thank You—different in linguistic origin, yet all express gratitude. Now that we are in the holiday season, you may want to convey appreciation to someone by expressing thanks or giving a gift, perhaps...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Off the Field, but Not Out of the Game: TOTAL 90 and the Plays That Could Change the Match

Some brands never fully fade, especially in industries in which nostalgia and cultural memory keep the brand alive long after a product line takes a step back. Nike’s TOTAL 90 line is one such example, remembered from its...more

Smart & Biggar

Quebec’s French language requirements for commerce and business: reform of the Charter of the French language

Smart & Biggar on

This article highlights important aspects of Canadian trademark practice and the benefits of owning a Canadian trademark registration. In Canada, applicants do not need to specify any filing bases in their applications and,...more

Knobbe Martens

Missing the (Lex)Mark – What Is the Proper Standing Test Before the USPTO?

Knobbe Martens on

Following a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) decision and corresponding Federal Circuit appeal finding that she did not have standing to oppose registration of a RAPUNZEL mark for dolls, Rebecca Curtin has filed a writ...more

Morgan Lewis

EUIPO Opposition Highlights Risk of Confusion from Disemvowelled Trade Marks

Morgan Lewis on

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Opposition Division recently upheld an opposition against the registration of “CNTRBND” as an EU trade mark, finding that there exists a likelihood of confusion with an...more

International Lawyers Network

The DuPont Factors for Trademark Registration

Suppose you have filed a trademark application to register a trademark that identifies a source of goods/services for your business. During examination of the trademark application, the United States Patent and Trademark...more

Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP

The Precedent: Federal Circuit Confirms that the Absence of Actual Confusion Is Not Dispositive of a Likelihood of Confusion in...

In this edition of The Precedent, we outline the decision in Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Intrastate Distribs., Inc. The Federal Circuit reversed a decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) dismissing Sunkist...more

International Lawyers Network

Australian Trade Mark Case Update: Lessons from Puma and Finish on Trade Mark Registrability and Opposition

When it comes to trade mark protection and registrability, being a reputable market-leading brand is not enough to guarantee either the registration of a mark, or a successful opposition to the registration of a competing...more

Knobbe Martens

Similar Does Not Mean Identical

Knobbe Martens on

APEX BANK v. CC SERVE CORP. - Before: Hughes, Moore, and Cunningham. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”). The Board erred by excluding evidence of marks used for similar services and restricting...more

K&L Gates LLP

Sage Advice from the Federal Court: Stylisation of Collab Marks

K&L Gates LLP on

In Paige v Sage and Paige, the Federal Court considered the existence of brand collaborations in the fashion industry, colloquially known as “collabs”, in assessing the deceptive similarity of trade marks....more

102 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide