In a case closely watched by the mutual fund industry, the federal district court in New Jersey ruled on Thursday in favor of a mutual fund’s investment adviser and against the shareholders who had brought the lawsuit under...more
8/29/2016
/ Actual Damages ,
Board of Directors ,
Burden of Proof ,
Credibility ,
Excessive Fees ,
Expert Testimony ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Gartenberg Factors ,
Investment Adviser ,
Judicial Deference ,
Mutual Funds ,
Section 36(b)
The final rule, while expanding the types of retirement investment advice covered by fiduciary protections, especially for IRAs, also provides carveouts for retirement education, order-taking by brokers and sales pitches to...more
On June 25, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether to grant certiorari in Tatum v. RJR Pension Investment Committee, 761 F.3d 346 (4th Cir. 2014). As discussed in the September 29, 2014 edition of the ELU, Tatum...more
The Fifth Circuit ruled last month that a plan investment advisor could not be held liable under ERISA for plan losses as a result of an investment, where the advisor did not act as a fiduciary with respect to that...more