If you sell goods in the State of California, you are probably familiar with Proposition 65 (“Prop 65”), which requires businesses to provide a warning before they “knowingly and intentionally expose any individual to a...more
4/15/2021
/ Amended Regulation ,
California ,
Manufacturers ,
OEHHA ,
Proposition 65 ,
Retailers ,
Safe Harbors ,
Suppliers ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Warning Labels
California apartment and other residential rental property landlords and their agents (e.g., property managers) with more than 10 employees need to comply with the State’s Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act (“Prop...more
6/12/2019
/ Landlords ,
New Regulations ,
OEHHA ,
Property Managers ,
Proposition 65 ,
Rental Property ,
Residential Property Owners ,
Safe Harbors ,
Toxic Chemicals ,
Toxic Exposure ,
Warning Labels
The California Office of the Attorney General is seeking to limit certain payment provisions common in Prop. 65 plaintiffs’ settlements with defendants. The proposed rulemaking, published September 25, 2015, would limit the...more
Late last week, California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”) released several new pre-regulatory draft proposals regarding Proposition 65 (“Prop 65”). With one possible exception, the pre-regulatory...more
9/2/2015
/ Arsenic ,
Beech-Nut ,
Comment Period ,
Food Manufacturers ,
Food Safety ,
Lead ,
OEHHA ,
Policy Drafting ,
Proposition 65 ,
Regulatory Agenda ,
Safe Harbors ,
Toxic Exposure