5th Circ. Continues Pro-Appraisal Trend In Texas

by Zelle LLP
Contact

Insurance Law360 - November 12, 2013

While appraisal is a method of dispute resolution commonly provided for in insurance contracts, many jurisdictions lack a well-developed body of case law addressing questions relating to the scope of appraisal, the role of party appraisers and umpires and other important issues. This is not the case, however, in Texas, where, in recent years, courts have generated a flood of appraisal-related decisions that cover a broad range of topics.

In its recent opinion in TMM Investments Ltd. v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.,[1] the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals continued this trend, reaffirming Texas’ role as a leading source of modern appraisal jurisprudence. The TMM Investments decision, which is decidedly pro-appraisal, is significant in that it demonstrates that courts in the Lone Star State will go to great lengths to preserve appraisal awards and that the scope of appraisal — at least in Texas — reaches well beyond quantum issues.

In TMM Investments, an insured shopping center owner claimed that it sustained severe roof damage during a hailstorm and subsequently (almost two years later) put its property insurance carrier on notice of the loss. The parties’ respective assessments of the damage were vastly different.

The insurer offered to pay the insured an amount based on the insurer’s estimate. The insured refused the offer and, invoking the “Appraisal Property Loss Conditions” section of the subject policy, demanded appraisal.

Pursuant to the terms of the policy, the parties each selected party appraisers, and the appraisers selected an umpire. During the appraisal process, the insurer’s party appraiser expressed concerns that while some of the claimed damage was caused by the hail storm, interior damage caused by water infiltration was not attributable to the storm.[2]

Both party appraisers issued their own, divergent appraisal reports opining as to the amount of the loss. However, the party appraisers agreed in their respective reports that the shopping center’s heating, ventilation and air conditioning system sustained $2,794 in damage.[3]

Several months later, the umpire issued an appraisal award, signed by the umpire and the insurer’s party appraiser.[4] Notably, the umpire chose to exclude from his award the damage to the HVAC system because he did not believe the damage affected the system’s operation.

The insurer ultimately tendered payment for the actual cash value (ACV) amount listed in the umpire’s award, less the policy deductible. After being notified by the insured that the umpire’s award did not include the HVAC damage, the insurer sent a check to the insured equal to the ACV amount stated in the award plus the agreed amount ($2,794) of the HVAC damage. The insured declined to accept the insurer’s check and sued its insurer, claiming that the appraisal process was flawed and that the award should be set aside.

On its cross-motion for summary judgment, the insured argued, inter alia, that the umpire had exceeded his authority by excluding from his award the damage to the HVAC system (which both party appraisers had agreed to), and the party appraisers exceeded their authority by improperly considering causation and coverage issues.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas accepted these arguments and concluded that the appraisal award was invalid and should be set aside in its entirety.

Don’t Throw Out the Appraisal Award with the Bathwater

On appeal, the Fifth Circuit agreed with the district court’s conclusion that the umpire had exceeded his authority in omitting the HVAC damages from the appraisal award. Citing several Texas appraisal cases, the court observed that “unless there is a discrepancy between the findings of the two appraisers appointed by the parties, there is no duty for the umpire to perform.”[5]

In the case at bar, there was no dispute between the party appraisers with respect to the amount of damage the HVAC system had sustained. However, while the Fifth Circuit recognized that the umpire had overstepped the bounds of his authority, the court determined that this error did not justify “throwing out” the entire appraisal award.[6]

The court reasoned that this “minor mistake[]” did not “taint the entire award” and should not “frustrate the parties’ intent to be bound by the appraisal provision of their contract.” The court therefore preserved the remainder of the appraisal award.

The decision in TMM Investments demonstrates that there is at least some willingness on the part of courts to overlook minor irregularities in appraisal awards — particularly when the problematic aspect of the award can be readily separated from the rest of the
award — for the sake of preserving awards and the intent of the parties.

Not Just a Numbers Game

In TMM Investments, the Fifth Circuit was also faced with the age-old question of whether appraisal panels may consider more than just quantum issues. While the district court below concluded that the appraisal panel had acted outside the scope of its contractually granted authority in considering issues relating to loss causation, the Fifth Circuit disagreed on this point and declined to set aside the appraisal award on this basis.

In setting aside the appraisal award, the court below found that the panel improperly “attribut[ed] the roof membrane damage to improper installation and the skylight damage to rocks thrown from below.”[7] However, the Fifth Circuit, relying on the Texas Supreme Court’s oft-cited decision in State Farm Lloyds v. Johnson,[8] concluded that an appraisal panel’s authority includes the consideration of issues beyond the amount of the loss, specifically, causation issues.

Citing Johnson, the Fifth Circuit noted, “Any appraisal necessarily includes some causation element because settling the ‘amount of loss’ requires appraisers to decide between damages for which coverage is claimed from damages caused by everything else.”[9] The court thus concluded that the appraisers acted within the scope of their authority in distinguishing damage “caused by pre-existing conditions from damage caused by the storm.”[10]

In upholding the appraisal award in TMM Investments, the Fifth Circuit confirmed that Johnson and its progeny are still alive and well and that the scope of appraisal remains broad in Texas.

While the TMM Investments decision is certainly pro-appraisal, the development of a significant body of appraisal case law in Texas may also be viewed as a positive development for appraisal more generally. As the amount of guiding precedent increases, so does the “certainty” attendant in the process.

For instance, knowing how courts have addressed issues relating to the scope of appraisal and the validity of awards may serve to guide parties’ conduct and allow them to be better able to decide whether appraisal is appropriate for their particular circumstances.

The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the firm, its clients, or Portfolio Media Inc., or any of its or their respective affiliates. This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice.

[1] No. 12-40635, 2013 WL 5222625, -- F.3d -- (5th Cir. Sept. 17, 2013).

[2] The insurer’s appraiser testified under oath that he believed that some of the claimed interior damage (damage to skylights) was the result of projectiles from inside the building (e.g., bullets, rocks) and not hail. Id. at *2.

[3] After issuing his report but before the umpire’s appraisal award was issued, the insured’s party appraiser resigned citing concerns with respect to the way the appraisal was being conducted. Id.

[4] The policy at issue contained a standard appraisal clause providing that a “decision agreed to by any two will be binding as to the amount of loss.” Id. at *1.

[5] Id.

[6] Id. at *5.

[7] Id. at *6.

[8] 290 S.W.3d 886 (Tex. 2009).

[9] TMM Investments, 2013 WL 5222625 at *7 (citing Johnson, 290 S.W.3d at 893).

[10] Id.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Zelle LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Zelle  LLP
Contact
more
less

Zelle LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!