A battle over collateral -- If regulators are worried about over-encumbered bank assets, they must look beyond just covered bonds

more+
less-

Originally published in International Financial Law Review in February 2013.

Covered bonds’ dual recourse nature makes them a favoured instrument for investors seeking both safety and yield. If the issuing financial institution fails, investors have preferred access – over all other creditors – to the cash flow and proceeds of the cover pool.

This often means that when market conditions are volatile or difficult, investors are more likely to buy covered bonds than a bank’s unsecured senior debt. Not surprisingly, it follows that issuers tend to rely more heavily on covered bonds over senior debt funding in difficult times. The result is that significantly more of an issuer’s assets become dedicated to covered bond investors.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Banks, Collateralized Debt Obligations, Covered Bonds, Credit Cards, Rating Agencies, Repurchases

Published In: Finance & Banking Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »