A battle over collateral -- If regulators are worried about over-encumbered bank assets, they must look beyond just covered bonds

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

Originally published in International Financial Law Review in February 2013.

Covered bonds’ dual recourse nature makes them a favoured instrument for investors seeking both safety and yield. If the issuing financial institution fails, investors have preferred access – over all other creditors – to the cash flow and proceeds of the cover pool.

This often means that when market conditions are volatile or difficult, investors are more likely to buy covered bonds than a bank’s unsecured senior debt. Not surprisingly, it follows that issuers tend to rely more heavily on covered bonds over senior debt funding in difficult times. The result is that significantly more of an issuer’s assets become dedicated to covered bond investors.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide