Agencies Announce Intent to Issue Final WOTUS Rule by September 1st

Nossaman LLP
Contact

On June 26, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) announced their intent to amend the Biden administration’s January 2023 waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule and issue a new final rule by September 1, 2023 – without first publishing a proposed rule and seeking public comment. The new rule will update the January 2023 WOTUS rule to be consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Sackett v. EPA and is intended to resolve current regulatory uncertainty regarding the federal government’s jurisdiction over WOTUS of the Clean Water Act.

The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) provides limited exceptions from the usual rulemaking process – when the agency has “good cause” to find the usual proposed rulemaking notice and comment process would be “impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to public interest,” the agency may skip this step and proceed to issuing a final rule. The agencies may take the position that issuing a proposed rule is unnecessary because the administration already completed the typical APA process in connection with its issuance of the January 2023 WOTUS rule, which is the same rule they are now amending. The agencies also may view the notice and comment process as contrary to the public interest because it would further prolong this period of regulatory uncertainty. However, if the agencies receive substantive adverse comments during the period between publication of the final rule in the Federal Register and the rule’s effective date (here, likely 60 days after the September 1st publication, so October 31, 2023), then the agencies must withdraw the final rule prior to the effective date and pursue the normal rulemaking process (starting with a proposed rule and a notice and comment period).

Despite the agencies’ attempt to fast-track this rulemaking, their approach to the process and substance of the new final rule are likely to be litigated.

The agencies likely opted to pursue a final rule (rather than taking the typical year plus to develop guidance) because of congressional pressure (House and Senate Republicans sent a letter to the agencies urging action on this issue on June 21, 2023) and the outsized impact prolonged uncertainty would have on the public. The agencies also may be attempting to insulate the new final rule from changes or potential reversal given the upcoming election year.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nossaman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Nossaman LLP
Contact
more
less

Nossaman LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide