Arbitration Clause Of A Loan Agreement Containing A Class Action Waiver Was Not Void As Being In Violation Of Public Policy


In Baldwin v. Regions Financial Corp., 98 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), the District Court of Appeal of the Third District of Florida held that an arbitration clause of a loan agreement, containing a class action waiver, was not void as being against public policy by being contrary to the remedies provided by the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA).

This case arose from Baldwin’s appeal of a non-final order granting Regions’ amended motion to compel arbitration. Baldwin had obtained a vehicle loan from Regions that contained an arbitration clause. This clause provided that either party could choose to arbitrate any dispute between them, and if a dispute is arbitrated, then Baldwin waived his class action rights. Regions then sent Baldwin and other debtors envelopes with the words “Consumer Collections” printed on the outside. Pursuant to Florida Statutes section 559.72(16), a person attempting to collect a debt may not mail communications to a debtor in an envelope with any words on the outside that are calculated to embarrass the debtor. Baldwin filed a putative class action complaint against Regions alleging that the envelopes were meant to embarrass the debtors in violation of this section of the FCCPA. In accordance with the loan agreement, Regions moved to compel arbitration.

Baldwin claimed that the arbitration clause waiving the right to a class action was in violation of the remedies provided by Florida Statute section 559.77(2) of the FCCPA. He argued this section allowed for $2,000 of statutory damages if the claim was brought as a class action, but only $1,000 as an individual action. Baldwin also argued that for a class action claim, the allowance for punitive damages and other equitable relief under the FCCPA was greater than that for an individual claim.

The Court disagreed with both arguments and affirmed the order under review. The Court first cited section 559.77(2) to demonstrate that both the prevailing plaintiff in an individual action and the named plaintiff in a class action may recover additional statutory damages not exceeding $1,000. The Court further stated that the clause providing for the award of punitive damages and equitable relief applied equally to a class action or individual claims.


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Carlton Fields Jorden Burt | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.