Arizona v. Lycett , 133 Ariz. 185 (1982)

Arizona v. Lycett


Lycett was convicted of violating Arizona's anti-pyramid law and appealed on the grounds that the statute was unconstitutionally vague and that the legislature unconstitutionally enacted a statute that did not require criminal intent to find a defendant guilty.

The case is also available at:

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:State, 9th Circuit, Arizona | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Babener & Associates on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.