In This Issue:
- Western District Of Washington: Denial of a Defense Where Additional-Insured Status Was Arguable, and Doing So in Reliance on Extrinsic Evidence, Were Both Acts of Bad Faith
- New York Court Rules That Documents Created After Suit Filed Are Not Categorically “Off Limits” in Discovery
- Western District of Washington: No Attorney-Client Privilege for Communications with In-House Counsel When the Only Claim is Bad Faith
- Florida Appellate Court Holds an Insured Must Obtain a Favorable Resolution in the Underlying Litigation for Benefits Prior to Bringing a Bad Faith Action
- Excerpt from Western District Of Washington: No Attorney-Client Privilege for Communications with In-House Counsel When the Only Claim is Bad Faith:
Plaintiff Tim Ryan Construction (“TRC”) was an additional insured under defendant Burlington Insurance Company’s (“Burlington”) insurance policy issued for TRC’s subcontractor Sound Glass Sales, Inc. (“Sound Glass”). In the underlying lawsuit, it was alleged that general contractor TRG was liable for a construction defect caused by several subcontractors, including Sound Glass. TRC tendered the underlying complaint to Burlington. Burlington denied coverage and TRC followed with the present lawsuit alleging, inter alia, bad faith due to Burlington’s coverage denial.
Please see full newsletter below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.