In This Issue:
- Court of Appeals of the State of Washington: Bad Faith Damages May Exceed the Amount of a Reasonable Covenant
- Southern District of Mississippi: Insurer Providing Coverage Opinion to Insured Constitutes Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Work-Product Protection as to all Communications Between Insurer and Coverage Counsel
- California Court of Appeals: Insurer Liable for Settlement Negotiated by Insured
- Excerpt from Court of Appeals of the State of Washington:
The Court of Appeals of the State of Washington held that a reasonable covenant judgment, consisting of the total liability of the insured to outstanding claimants, represented the minimum amount of damage suffered by an insured when his insurer failed to settle the claims in good faith.
Please see full publication below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Appeals, Attorney-Client Privilege, Bad Faith, Insureds, Insurers, Work Product Privilege
Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Insurance Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Saul Ewing LLP | Attorney Advertising