Basel Committee Issues Final Rules on Measuring and Controlling Large Exposures


On April 15, 2013, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) issued final rules (the “Final Rules”) concerning the supervisory framework for measuring and controlling large exposures, setting tighter limits on single counterparty (or a group of connected counterparties) credit risk exposures for all banks.  The Final Rules set the general exposure limit to 25% of a bank’s Tier 1 capital, instead of the existing limit of 25% of a bank’s total capital, for all banks.   However, a stricter limit of 15% of Tier 1 capital is imposed on banks that have been designated as global systemically important banks (“G-SIBs”), the higher-end of the 10-15% range suggested in the proposed version of the Final Rules (the “Proposed Rules”) issued by the Basel Committee in March 2013.  A country may, of course, impose limits on its banks that are more stringent than those of the Basel Committee.

The Final Rules also incorporate changes to the Proposed Rules’ definition of a large exposure, such that large exposure is defined as the sum of all exposure values of a bank to a counterparty (or to a group of connected counterparties) equal to or above 10% of a bank’s eligible capital base, instead of the Proposed Rules’ 5% threshold.  Other changes in the Final Rules to the Proposed Rules include a replacement of the proposed 1% granularity threshold for exposures to securitization vehicles (which would have required banks to first assess whether any underlying exposure represented more than 1% of the transaction, and then, if so, look-through to the underlying exposures to counterparties and adding these to any direct exposures to the same counterparties), with a materiality threshold (which instead relates the underlying exposure value to the capital base of the bank, but still requires adding such exposures to the same counterparty) of 0.25%.

The new supervisory framework will take effect beginning January 1, 2019. 

The Basel Committee also stated that it plans to review setting a large exposure limit to qualifying central counterparties related to clearing activities, which are currently exempted under the Final Rules, following an observation period that will conclude in 2016.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this informational piece (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.


Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin Procter LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.