Bell v. Health-Mor, 549 F2d 342 (1977)

Bell v. Health-Mor


The Court of appeals held that a claim that is plainly frivolous or insubstantial should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Plaintiffs successfully made a colorable claim that the payment of a finder’s fee for potential door-to-door vacuum sales customers could be considered a security under federal law. The program could have been construed as a security if the referral fee was the product of the efforts of the company, or it could be a legitimate business opportunity if it was the product of the efforts of the vendor. Because the Court of Appeals was unable to determine the answer on the record of the District Court, they reversed.

This case is also available at:

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:Federal, 5th Circuit, Louisiana | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Babener & Associates on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.