The Delaware Chancery Court recently enjoined a board of directors from impeding a stockholder’s solicitation of written consents to replace the board, unless the board first approved the stockholder’s nominees for purposes of a change in control provision in the company’s credit agreements (Kallick v. SandRidge Energy, Inc., March 8, 2013). The court found that the board’s failure to provide that approval, without a “rational, good faith justification,” even while otherwise campaigning against the stockholder’s nominees, would violate the board’s fiduciary duties.
TPG-Axon owned approximately 7% of SandRidge. Dissatisfied with the company’s performance, TPG demanded that the company declassify the board, add stockholder representatives to the board, replace the CEO and explore strategic alternatives.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Board of Directors, Credit Agreements, Fiduciary Duty, Injunctions, Proxy Put, Rival Director Slate
Published In: Business Organization Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Securities Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising