BREAKING: Ninth Circuit Reverses in Marks v. Crunch Appeal. Holds ATDS Includes Device That Stores Telephone Numbers to Be Called, Regardless of Random or Sequential Number Generation

Womble Bond Dickinson
Contact

The Marks v. Crunch appeal was just published a moment ago, and the Ninth Circuit has weighed in on the definition of an ATDS. Held:

[T]he statutory definition of ATDS includes a device that stores telephone numbers to be called, whether or not those numbers have been generated by a random or sequential number generator.

We are diving into the opinion right now, and will provide you our in-depth analysis shortly. Stay tuned.

[View source.]

Written by:

Womble Bond Dickinson
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Womble Bond Dickinson on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide