Brown v. Executive 200 , 64 Ohio St. 2d 250 (1980)

Brown v. Executive 200


The Ohio Supreme Court held that the standard for a criminal contempt conviction is the same as a regular criminal conviction: guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Executive 200 had previously been enjoined from operating a pyramid scheme. They did not follow the previous injunction, and the Ohio Attorney General brought a second action to charge them with violating the earlier order. The Trial Court ruled that the standard to be applied was clear and convincing. The Supreme Court held that for any criminal conviction, including criminal contempt, the standard was beyond a reasonable doubt.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:State, 6th Circuit, Ohio | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Babener & Associates on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.