Burr Alert: Is “Materially Less” The Same As “Grossly Inadequate”?

more+
less-

Tennessee was one of many states jumping on the debtor protection bandwagon following disclosures of lender misconduct in the wake of the 2007 real estate market collapse. The legislative solution crafted into Tenn. Code Ann. 35-5-118 created a rebuttable presumption that the amount bid at a foreclosure sale equaled the fair market value of the property. Debtors could overcome this presumption by showing that the bid was “materially less” than fair market value. The statute became effective September 1, 2010. Prior to that time, the standard for setting aside foreclosures was whether the bid amount was “grossly inadequate.”

There has been much debate in legal circles as to whether the new statutory approach would pave the way for debtors to defeat or reduce deficiency judgments. In the only two cases decided since the act went into effect, both the Eastern and Middle Sections of the Court of Appeals have found in favor of the lenders.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Burr & Forman | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Burr & Forman on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×