Compelled by U.S. Supreme Court precedent advancing arbitration as a method of dispute resolution, the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (No. S20432, June 23, 2014) held that its decision in Gentry v. Superior Court is no longer good law and that arbitration agreements with mandatory class action waivers are generally enforceable. However, the court carved out an exception for representative actions brought under California’s Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”), holding that employers cannot force employees to waive their right to bring representative PAGA actions in any forum.
The court’s decision in Iskanian means that while employers may limit their exposure to wage and hour class actions by using arbitration agreements that include class action waivers, employers still face representative actions based on unwaivable PAGA claims, much of which remain uncharted territory.
Please see full Alert below for more Information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Arbitration, Class Action, Class Action Arbitration Waivers, CLS Transportation, Employer Liability Issues, Employment Contract, Federal Arbitration Act, Iskanian, PAGA, SCOTUS, Trucking Industry, Wage and Hour
Published In: Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Conflict of Laws Updates, Labor & Employment Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP | Attorney Advertising