California Supreme Court Issues Opinion In Tobacco II Cases Re: Applicability of Standing Requirements For Unnamed Class Members

more+
less-

In a long awaited decision, the California Supreme Court has issued its opinion on the impact of the injury standing requirements of Proposition 64 on class Unfair Competition Law ("UCL") claims. The results? An apparent victory for the plaintiff's bar and the removal of a bar to putative UCL class actions brought on behalf of individuals who have questionably suffered any injury-in-fact.

In this matter, the California Supreme Court answered two questions:

"First, who in a UCL class action must comply with Proposition 64's standing requirements, the class representatives or all unnamed class members, in order for the class action to proceed?"

"Second, what is the causation requirement for purposes of establishing standing under the UCL, and in particular what is the meaning of the phrase 'as a result of' in section 17204?"

Please see full post for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Antitrust & Trade Regulation Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Personal Injury Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »