California Supreme Court Rules on Class Waivers


The court holds that class action waivers in arbitration agreements are enforceable but PAGA waivers are not.

On June 23, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC.[1] The court found that class action waivers in arbitration agreements are enforceable. The court rejected arguments made by the plaintiff that class action waivers are unlawful under the National Labor Relations Act. However, the court concluded that waivers to bring representative actions on behalf of the state under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) are contrary to public policy. The court held that the Federal Arbitration Act does not preempt state law prohibiting waivers of PAGA representative actions in employment arbitration agreements.

Our upcoming LawFlash will provide more detailed discussion of the decision and its implications for employers.

[1]. No. S204032 (Cal. June 23, 2014), available here.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morgan Lewis | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Morgan Lewis on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.