CalPERS Allowed To Continue Rating Agency Suit

Allen Matkins
Contact

In 2009, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System filed a lawsuit alleging negligent misrepresentation and negligent interference with prospective economic advantage against Moody’s Investors Services, Inc., Moody’s Corporation and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.  The defendants filed a special motion to strike the complaint under California’s anti-SLAPP statute, Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16. The trial court denied the motion and both sides appealed.

Last Friday, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s ruling.  Cal. Pub. Emp. Ret. Sys. v. Moody’s Inv. Serv., Inc.,  2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 454 (May 23, 2014).  The Court of Appeal found that CalPERS’ action arose from the defendants’ activities in furtherance of their constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue.  However, the Court of Appeal agreed that CalPERS had met its burden to establish, based on competent and admissible evidence, “a probability” of prevailing on the merits.  The Court of Appeal also rejected the defendants’ affirmative defenses of the First Amendment and federal preemption under the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Allen Matkins
Contact
more
less

Allen Matkins on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide