Can Age Discrimination Be Proved?


The U.S. Supreme Court has again "made law," and it has direct implications for lawyers who have been de-equitized or laid off. The Court, in its 5-4 decision in the case Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., said that the burden of proving age discrimination lies solely with the plaintiff. In previous cases, the plaintiff merely had to prove that age was a factor, and then the employer had to show that there were legitimate reasons for the termination. How will plaintiffs be able to show that age was the primary factor? After all, the plaintiff was not in the room when the decision to terminate was made.

Please see full Lawbiz Tip for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Rights Updates, Labor & Employment Updates, Professional Practice Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ed Poll, LawBiz | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Ed Poll

Would you like to take your law practice to the next level of success? Corporate America creates... View Profile »

Follow LawBiz:

Reporters on Deadline