Can The Association’s Documents Be Contradictory And Still Enforceable?

Husch Blackwell LLP
Contact

A recent New York Court dealt with an issue on leasing (Olszewski v. Cannon Point Association, Inc., 148 A.D.3d 1306 (2017)).  The Board adopted rules and regulations that placed restrictions on leasing that contradicted relevant portions of the Association’s Bylaws.  The Association then fined the owner for violating these restrictions and the owner sued.  The owner won at the circuit court level and the Association appealed.  On appeal, the Court again ruled in favor of the owner, upholding the trial court’s decision.  Why?

The Bylaws stated in relevant part that: “any home may be conveyed or leased by its … owner free of any restrictions” provided the owner is current with his assessments. Even though the Bylaws gave the Board the authority to pass rules and regulations as they saw fit, it did not give the Board the authority to contradict a provision already in the Bylaws.

Associations need to be aware of the priority given to each of the governing documents and to make sure these documents work together in order to avoid situations like this New York case. The small amount it will cost to have that review done at the front end could save your Association thousands of  dollars later on.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Husch Blackwell LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Husch Blackwell LLP
Contact
more
less

Husch Blackwell LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide