New York v. Luongo , 58 A.D.2d 895 (1977)

Can the promoter of a pyramid scheme be convicted of larceny by false pretenses if some of the investments made by the promoter were legitimate?


The New York Appellate Division concluded that all of the promoter's promises need not be false to be convicted of larceny by false pretenses. The promoter made some investments in legitimate enterprises, but he also made others in shell companies that existed in name only. He argued that he was simply the victim of bad investments. The Court held that the bad investments argument was without merit, and the evidence showed that the promoter himself even considered that the program a pyramid scheme.

Full case and case summary also available online at:

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Criminal Law Updates, MLM / Direct Sales Updates, MLM Consulting / Network Marketing Updates

Reference Info:State, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


Welcome to MLM Legal - a valuable resource to the Multi-Level Marketing and Direct Sales Industry. ... View Profile »

Follow Babener & Associates:

Reporters on Deadline