Callwave Communications, LLC v. AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al., C.A. No. 12-1701 – RGA; Callwave Communications, LLC v. Sprint Spectrum L. P., et al., 12-1702 – RGA; Callwave Communications, LLC v. Verizon Services Corp, et al., 12-1704 – RGA; Broadsoft, Inc. v. Callwave Communications, LLC 12-1711 – RGA, June 3, 2015
Andrews, J. Claim construction opinion regarding 14 disputed terms from 7 patents.
-
The disputed patents relate to call processing. The following terms were considered:
-
"call"
-
"outcall from the call processing system" and "outcall"
-
"placing/place a[n] [first/new/second/third] [out]call" and "outcall is placed" and "outcall is to be placed"
-
"switched network"
-
"bridging the ... [out]call and the ... [out]call" and "causing ... to be bridged"
-
"forward[ed]"
-
"transfer[ ring]"
-
"call handling"
-
"call redirection instruction"
-
"causing the first entity call to be selectively connected to one of a plurality of potential second entity terminal destinations"
-
"subscriber specified rule" and "subscriber instruction"
-
"[a/the] network"
-
"call processing system"
-
"substantially real time"x