Patents

A Patent Landscape Analysis: iPSCs

by Antoinette F. Konski | Foley & Lardner LLP on 5/21/2013

There are several emerging technology clusters in the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) space. Simon Elliot and I conducted a patent landscape analysis focusing on issued U.S. patents and pending applications....more

USPTO Launches New After Final Consideration Pilot Program to Reduce Requests for Continued Examination (RCEs)

by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff | Foley & Lardner LLP on 5/21/2013

In a Federal Register Notice published on May 17, 2013, the USPTO announced After Final Consideration Pilot Program 2.0 (AFCP 2.0) as part of its ongoing efforts to “reduce pendency by reducing the number of Requests for...more

DOJ Issues Rare Unfavorable Business Review Letter Regarding Patent Licensing Pools

by Shylah R. Alfonso, Jacqueline Young | Perkins Coie on 5/21/2013

On March 26, 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a rare negative business review letter declining to approve a plan by Intellectual Property Exchange International Inc. (IPXI) to offer a financial exchange for...more

CLS Bank Int'l v. Alice Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2013) (en banc) -- Chief Judge Rader's Concurrence-in-part and Dissent-in-part

by Michael Borella | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 5/21/2013

A previous post presented the background of this case, as well as Judge Lourie's plurality concurrence. As noted in that post, Alice's claimed inventions involved the reduction of settlement risk using a third-party...more

Alice in Patentland II – Can a Look Across the Pond Help?

by Orlando Lopez | Burns & Levinson LLP on 5/21/2013

On May 10, 2013, the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued their en-banc opinion(s) on CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. Alice, an Australian corporation, had appealed the decision of the District Court invalidating the claims for not...more

ITC Section 337 Update - May 15, 2013

by King & Spalding on 5/20/2013

Federal Circuit Affirms Commission Determination That Litigation Activities Unrelated To Licensing Do Not Satisfy Domestic Industry – On May 13, 2013, the Federal Circuit affirmed a January 2012 Commission determination that...more

Around the Virtual World: May 13-17, 2013

by Pillsbury Social Media, Entertainment &... on 5/20/2013

A weekly wrap up of interesting news about virtual worlds, virtual goods and other social media. In This Issue: - What's the Matter With Zynga? - Video game maker drops gun makers, not their guns -...more

Court Report -- May 19, 2013

by Sherri Oslick | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 5/20/2013

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. AbbVie Inc. v. Hetero USA Inc. et al. 1:13-cv-00852; filed May 15, 2013 in the District Court of Delaware - •...more

Litigation Alert: Federal Circuit Split on Patent Eligible Subject Matter Analysis

by Darren Donnelly, Enia Titova | Fenwick & West LLP on 5/20/2013

Last week, the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, issued a much-anticipated decision in CLS Bank Int'l, et al., v. Alice Corporation Pty, Ltd. involving the test for when computer-related inventions are unpatentable "abstract...more

Patent Eligibility of Software Innovations After CLS Bank

by Richard Gervase Jr., Peter Snell | Mintz Levin - Intellectual Property on 5/20/2013

The en banc Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently could not agree on the proper approach for determining whether software-based inventions constitute patent eligible subject matter under § 101 of the patent...more

Patent Exhaustion Rejected: Patented Seed Purchaser Has No Right to Make Copies

by Cynthia Chen, Paul Devinsky, Lincoln Mayer | McDermott Will & Emery on 5/17/2013

The Supreme Court in Bowman v. Monsanto Co. ruled unanimously that a farmer’s replanting of harvested seeds constituted making new infringing articles. While the case is important for agricultural industries, the Supreme...more

CLS Bank v. Alice Corp. Further Muddies §101 Patent Eligibility

by Warren Heit, Kevin McGann | White & Case LLP on 5/17/2013

On May 10, 2013, the Federal Circuit issued deeply divided opinions on the standards to be applied to determine patent eligibility of software and business method patents, further opening the door to challenges of such...more

Court Report Supplement -- May 16, 2013

by Ann Palma | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 5/17/2013

About Court Report Supplement: Periodically, we will report on biotech and pharma cases that were inadvertently omitted from our Court Report column. Tawnsaura Group, LLC v. Direct Digital, LLCL: 8:13-cv-00004; filed...more

CLS Bank: A Deeply Divided En Banc Federal Circuit Fails to Rule When Computer Claims are Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101

by Monte Cooper, Robert Isackson, William Benjamin Tabler | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on 5/16/2013

On May 10, 2013, the en banc Federal Circuit issued its highly anticipated decision in CLS Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd., No. 2011-1301, concerning whether computer-implemented method and system claims are patent...more

Patent Watch: Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Genentech, Inc.

by Lawrence M. Sung | BakerHostetler on 5/16/2013

On May 10, 2013, in Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH v. Genentech, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Rader, Dyk, Reyna*) affirmed the district court's denial of Genentech's motion to enjoin Sanofi from...more

CLS Bank Int'l v. Alice Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2013) (en banc) -- Judge Lourie's Concurrence

by Michael Borella | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 5/16/2013

On May 10, the Federal Circuit handed down a much anticipated en banc ruling regarding the patent eligibility of computer-implemented inventions under 35 U.S.C. § 101. In a per curiam opinion that is perhaps the most...more

Supreme Court Rules in Patent Exhaustion Case: Farmer’s Use of Second Generation Seed Constitutes Infringement

by K. Scott O'Brian | McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC on 5/16/2013

On May 13, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that patent exhaustion does not bar an infringement claim in a case involving a farmer who reproduced patented seeds by planting and harvesting second generation seeds...more

Supreme Court Finds for Monsanto in Seed Harvesting Case

by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff | Foley & Lardner LLP on 5/16/2013

In Bowman v. Monsanto Co., the Supreme Court held that the doctrine of patent exhaustion does not give a farmer who has bought patented seeds the right to “reproduce” them through planting and harvesting without the patent...more

Don’t Blame the Bean: The Monsanto Patent Decision

by Field Law on 5/16/2013

In the case of Bowman v. Monsanto Company (May 13, 2013), the US Supreme Court has weighed into this thorny field, and on Monday it delivered a unanimous judgment upholding the rights in Monsanto’s patented soybeans. (See our...more

U.S. Supreme Court Qualifies Patent Exhaustion

by Melissa Hunter-Ensor, Ph.D., Peter Lauro | Saul Ewing LLP on 5/16/2013

On May 13, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Bowman v. Monsanto, decided whether a soybean farmer infringed Monsanto’s patent by replanting patented soybeans harvested from previous crops. The Court unanimously...more

Federal Circuit Refuses To Enjoin International Arbitration Of Patent Claims

by Liz Kramer | Leonard, Street and Deinard - Arbitration... on 5/16/2013

Just after I posted about the awesome power of federal courts to enjoin other cases, the Federal Circuit reminds us the power is not absolute....more

Publications Patent Exhaustion Does Not Apply to the Reproduction of Patented Seeds

by Erik Olson, Stephanie Skaff | Farella Braun + Martel LLP on 5/15/2013

On May 13, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bowman v. Monsanto Co., 569 U.S. ___ (2013), which concerned whether and how patent exhaustion applies to self-replicating patented articles. Monsanto...more

Patent Watch: Motiva, LLC. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n

by Lawrence M. Sung | BakerHostetler on 5/15/2013

The "Commission is fundamentally a trade forum, not an intellectual property forum" [and] litigation expenses directed at preventing, instead of encouraging manufacture of, articles incorporating patented technology does not...more

Bowman v. Monsanto: Self-Replicating Biotech and Software Left at the Alter?

by Robert Isackson | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on 5/15/2013

Today, in a case having the potential to upset the agricultural biotech industry, Justice Elena Kagan delivered the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous decision rejecting farmer Vernon Hugh Bowman’s patent exhaustion defense....more

MBHB Snippets: Review of Developments in Intellectual Property Law - Spring 2013 - Volume 11, Issue 2: Implementing the New Micro...

by Joshua Bosman, Gregory Huffman | McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on 5/15/2013

As part of new rules introduced by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), a new section that defines a “micro entity” was added to Title 35 of the United States Code. As a subset of small entity status, micro entity...more

Home

Legal News

Find a Lawyer

Browse Subjects

Subscribe

Pro Services

For Reporters