McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC (PTAB 2016)

Sally Beauty (Petitioner) filed a Petition requesting a review under the transitional program for covered business method (CBM) patents of U.S. Patent No. 5,969,324, owned by Intellectual Ventures I LLC (IV)…more
| Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

The Effect of Patents and Drug Price Regulation on New Drug Diffusion Globally

One of the great benefits of scientific inquiry is the capacity for presumptions and prejudices from experience to be challenged and explained in ways that are counter-intuitive. This is true even for disciplines like…more
| Commercial Law & Contracts, Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade, Science, Computers, & Technology

PTAB Life Sciences Report

About the PTAB Life Sciences Report: Each week we will report on recent developments at the PTAB involving life sciences patents…more
| Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Of Technical Tools and Problems: Going Beyond the Two-Prong Alice Test

It is abundantly clear that the Supreme Court's 2014 Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank decision has significantly changed the patent-eligibility landscape for business methods and some types of software inventions. For instance, in 2015,…more
| Administrative Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Apotex Inc. v. Wyeth LLC (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Perhaps the most significant Supreme Court decision in the past quarter century for the working patent practitioner is Dickinson v. Zurko, which strictly speaking is less a patent case than an administrative law decision. But…more
| Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Netsirv v. Boxbee, Inc. (PTAB 2016)

A post grant review (PGR) is an administrative reconsideration of a recent-granted U.S. patent. The proceeding is held in the USPTO, before that body's Patent Trial and Appeal Board. A petition for PGR is timely if it is filed…more
| Administrative Law, Intellectual Property

IPRs Threatened/Filed as Money-Making Strategy

On March 10, 2016, Silver Star Capital, LLC filed a petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079 (IPR2016-00736). The patent owner is Power Integrations, Inc. On its face, this seems like another IPR filed…more
| Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

In re Aqua Products, Inc. -- CAFC Grants Rehearing En Banc to Consider PTAB Motions to Amend

On Friday, August 13, 2016, the Federal Circuit granted a petition for rehearing en banc filed in the In re Aqua Products, Inc. case to consider two questions related to the PTAB's treatment of Motions to Amend in IPR…more
| Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

In re Magnum Oil Tools Int'l, Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2016)

McClinton Energy Group filed an inter partes review (IPR) petition against all claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,079,413, owned by Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd. The USPTO's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted the…more
| Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Court Report - August 2016

About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. v. Lee - 1:16-cv-00852; filed July 1, 2016 in the Eastern District of…more
| Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Appistry, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (W.D. Wash. 2016)

Last month, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted Defendant Amazon.com's Motion to Dismiss for Invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 101 on the grounds that the two patents asserted by Plaintiff Appistry,…more
| Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

AbbVie v. Amgen: The Litigation Phase for a HUMIRA® Biosimilar Begins

To date, Amgen has been the reference product sponsor for many biosimilar applications. Correspondingly, Amgen has been the Plaintiff in many of the litigations that have been based on the provisions of the Biosimilar Price…more
| Administrative Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Polar Electro Oy (Fed. Cir. 2016); Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Garmin Int'l., Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2016)

In parallel decisions regarding litigation over the same patent, the Federal Circuit affirmed a District Court decision that the claims were invalid for indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b). This decision, expressly applying…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Letter to Colombian President Encourages Grant of Compulsory License for Imatinib

Last month, we reported on letters sent by two Senators and fifteen Representatives to the U.S. Trade Representative, seeking clarification regarding the Administration's position on compulsory licenses. The letters were…more
| Elections & Politics, Health, Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade, Science, Computers, & Technology

Hudson Institute Report Refutes UN Panel Stance on Impact of Patents on Access to Medicines

In June, the Hudson Institute released a research report that analyzes several positions taken by the United Nations (UN) High Level Panel on Access to Medicines (HLP) on the impact of patents on global access to medicines. The…more
| Civil Rights, Health, Intellectual Property, International Law & Trade, Science, Computers, & Technology
Showing 1-15 of 1445 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 97
Contact

300 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606-6709, United States

  • 312.913.0001
  • 312.913.0002

Areas of Practice
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • California
  • North Carolina
Number of Attorneys

50-100 Attorneys

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×