Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

1100 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20005 , United States

  • 202.371.2600
  • 202.371.2540

Generic Top Level Domains - Current Sunrise Periods Open

As first reported in our December 2013 newsletter, the first new generic top-level domains (gTLDs, the group of letters after the "dot" in a domain name) have launched their "Sunrise" registration periods. Please see our…more
| Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Markit to Market - December 2014

The December issue of Sterne Kessler's MarkIt to MarketTM newsletter includes news on how the USPTO is tackling its "deadwood" problem, the reduced USPTO fees for 2015, and an updated list of the Sunrise periods currently open…more
| Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property

Design Patent Case Digest: Young v. Stone

Decision Date: August 28, 2014 - Court: N.D. Illinois - Patent: D442,661 - Holding: Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings of non-infringement - GRANTED Opinion: Plaintiff…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

USPTO Issues New Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Interim Guidelines – Nature-Based Product Guidance

On December 16, 2014, the USPTO issued a comprehensive interim Guidance document for examination of subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The new Guidance document supplements the June 2014 Preliminary Examination…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

USPTO Issues New Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Interim Guidelines – Abstract Idea Guidance

On December 15, 2014, the USPTO issued Interim Guidance for examination of subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101. These new guidelines largely follow the previous interim guidelines issued on June 25, 2014, in view of…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Design Patent Case Digest: Reddy v. Lowe’s Companies, Inc.

Decision Date: November 18, 2014 - Court: District of Massachusetts - Patent: D677,423 - Holding: Plaintiff’s proposed claim construction ADOPTED - Opinion: Plaintiff Maureen Reddy sued…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Federal Circuit’s Sandoz Decision Increases Importance of Post-Grant Proceedings to Biosimilar Developers

On Friday, December 5, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit rendered its decision in Sandoz v. Amgen, No. 2014-1693, a case with major implications for the emerging U.S. biosimilars industry. The decision addresses…more
| Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

The Latest on Inherent Obviousness

On December 3, 2014, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Alkermes Pharma Ireland Limited v. TWI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., agreeing with the district court’s analysis and conclusions on motivation…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

Good(s) Intentions – What's Enough to Establish Bona Fide Intent to Use?

When used effectively, brand and merchandise licensing can increase the value of a brand by extending it into new, relevant product categories and by further monetizing brand equity. And when seeking to protect a brand in…more
| Civil Procedure, Commercial Law & Contracts, Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property

Look Beyond the Registration to Determine Likelihood of Confusion

Just in time for the holiday shopping season, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's recent decision in Anthropologie, Inc. and Urban Outfitters Wholesale, Inc. v. Happy Green Company LLC is a good reminder of why, when clearing…more
| Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property

Design Patent Case Digest: High Point Design LLC and Meijer, Inc., Sears Holding Corp. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Buyers Direct, Inc.

Decision Dates: September 11, 2013 and March 26, 2014 - Courts: Federal Circuit and the Southern District of New York Patent: D598,183 - Holding: Grant of summary judgment of invalidity REVERSED and REMANDED; on…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property

Generic Top Level Domains - Current Sunrise Periods Open

As first reported in our December 2013 newsletter, the first new generic top-level domains (gTLDs, the group of letters after the "dot" in a domain name) have launched their "Sunrise" registration periods. Please see our…more
| Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property, Science, Computers, & Technology

MarkIt to Market - November 2014

The November issue of Sterne Kessler's MarkIt to MarketTM newsletter includes a case study on bona fide intent to use, a resolution to Anthropologie's opposition to the mark, and an updated list of the Sunrise periods currently…more
| Civil Procedure, Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property

Oktoberfest Special: Störtebeker, What’s in a Beer Name?

We brand geeks at MarkIt to Market occasionally like to explore the history of interesting trademarks. A recent visit to Germany inspired a look into the history of the Störtebeker beer brand, which derives its name from one of…more
| Communications & Media Law, Intellectual Property

Design Patent Case Digest: Wallace v. Ideavillage Products Corp.

Decision Date: September 15, 2014 - Court: District of New Jersey - Patents: D485,990 - Holding: Defendant’s motion for summary judgment: GRANTED - Opinion: Allyson Wallace, initially acting pro se,…more
| Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property
Showing 1-15 of 193 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 13
Areas of Practice
  • Intellectual Property
  • Litigation
Locations
Other U.S. Locations
  • D.C.
Number of Attorneys

100+ Attorneys

This profile may constitute attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Any correspondence with this profile holder does not constitute a client/attorney relationship. Neither the content on this profile nor transmissions between you and the profile holder through this profile are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.