Comparing Suicide Pricing by Lawyers and Antitrust Claims for Below-Cost Pricing

by Valorem Law Group LLC
Contact

Seemingly unrelated, the WSJ’s discussion of antitrust claims challenging below-cost pricing (Antitrust Busters with Gavels, 4/26/2013) and the Internet tabloid Above the Law’s discussion of increased use of “suicide pricing” by Biglaw (Buying In: Suicide Pricing, 4/16/2013), have at least one thing in common; in each instance, the consequence of the irrationally low pricing is that the consumer gets screwed. At least antitrust laws recognize the problem as a matter of public policy and provide a remedy where this occurs in covered marketplace activities. With respect to legal services, there is no such remedy – caveat emptor, let the legal services buyer beware.

How these antitrust claims and below cost lawyer fees are connected after the break.

Above the Law argues that Biglaw has embraced the practice of so-called “suicide pricing,” or pricing services well below the cost of producing these services, in a desperate effort to maintain market share. “How bad has it gotten,” asks the “anonymous partner” authoring the post? His answer:

Pretty bad. I have heard reports of work being offered for free. As in no charge. I have never gone down that road and would find another line of work if I felt I needed to. But it is happening, and it is insidious.

Law firm management guru Ed Reeser’s additional gloss in his April 16 newsletter:

More prevalent are the growing examples of “suicide pricing,” or offering rates so low that they are almost certain to result in massive write-downs or an unprofitable engagement.

The core problem with this pricing approach is that “[n]o self-respecting client should ever want to have their lawyers working for free” (Above the Law). The firms engaged in this practice are going to react by cutting services to the bone, directing the work to the lowest common denominator lawyers who generally reside at the low end of their firm’s food chain (saving the more skilled, productive lawyers for the firm’s higher revenue projects), and ultimately penalize any and all of the unfortunate souls who end up responsibile for the horribly low realization on time spent. Even assuming skilled and experienced lawyers were assigned the case, under the circumstances, morale is low and the incentive to identify and deliver the service sought by the client is even lower. The lawyer’s suicide pricing murders client service. (Ed Reeser deserves origination credit on this turn of phrase -- his insight, though, was that suicide pricing by the firm is murder to the folks who have to provide legal services under this structure.)

Turning to the WSJ discussion of antitrust law, the focus is on lower court decisions undermining Supreme Court authority holding that low prices alone do not satisfy antitrust requirements. Instead, under what is called the price-cost test, a plaintiff must prove “that the [defendant's] prices are below an appropriate measure of [the defendant's] costs.” Brooke Grp. Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209, 222 (1993).

Professors Crane and Sokol, writing for WSJ, argue that protecting consumers requires reversal of the lower court rulings because “aggressive price-cutting is exactly the sort of behavior that antitrust law should encourage, because it helps consumers.” Penalizing cost cutting that does not drop prices below cost of production hurts “consumers [who] might have benefited from low prices.”

However, where prices are set so low that they do not cover costs there is a legally cognizable antitrust claim. Why? From the economic perspective touted by professors Crane and Sokol, there is a legitimate basis for finding this superdiscounted prices injures competition and harms consumers.

The common thread, then, is that suicide pricing by lawyers and below-cost pricing by competitors each harm consumers of the respective services.

Of course, the two discussions just clearly diverge in terms of the remedies available to consumers. Antitrust laws promote competition and consumer interests by allowing the government to bring criminal charges as well as private rights of action to parties facing below-cost pricing by a competitor. In contrast, there is no equivalent protection afforded the consumer (client) whose legal services suffer as a result of the suicide pricing by their law firm. (You might reply, "but what about malpractice claims based on ethical violations of the duties of competence and loyalty?" Good luck trying to make this case, let alone pay another set of lawyers to try to do so after the fact. Practically speaking, such claims pose little risk to lawyers and consequently do not deter client-detrimental pricing.)

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Valorem Law Group LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Valorem Law Group LLC
Contact
more
less

Valorem Law Group LLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.