Constitutional Amendment Proposes to Exempt Public Records Act and Brown Act Mandates from Reimbursement


Amendment Subject to a Vote of the People in June 2014

In accordance with the procedures for amendment of the California Constitution, two-thirds of each house of the State Legislature has approved Senate Constitutional Amendment (SCA) 3, which creates a Constitutional directive that local agencies comply with the California Public Records Act and the Ralph M. Brown Act, and future amendments to either Act, and exempts the State from the requirement to reimburse local agencies for compliance with mandates under either Act. Like all Constitutional amendments, SCA 3 is subject to a popular vote and will appear on the June 2014 ballot. If a majority of voters approve, the amendment will go into effect the following day.

Earlier this year, Governor Brown vetoed proposed Assembly Bill 76, which would have suspended certain mandates in the Public Records Act, including the requirement to provide written notice to a requester within 10 days regarding whether the local agency has disclosable records responsive to a request, the requirement to notify a requester of the reason to extend the deadline for such a response, the requirement to assist requesters to make a “focused and effective request,” and the requirement to notify a requester in writing if his or her request is denied. At that time, it was reported that the State had not paid any reimbursements to local agencies for compliance with these mandates.

In November 2012, voters approved Proposition 30, which added a provision to the California Constitution stating “[a]ny requirement that a local agency comply with” the Brown Act, “with respect to performing its Public Safety Services responsibilities, or any other matter, shall not be a reimbursable mandate[.]” The effect of this change was to eliminate the requirement for the State to reimburse local agencies for compliance with the current provisions of the Brown Act.

SCA 3 takes this a step further and provides that compliance with the Brown Act and Public Records Act, and any future amendments to either, is required by the Constitution, and that the State is not required to reimburse local agencies for their cost to comply with mandates under either Act.

Until SCA 3 is approved by the voters, mandates under the California Public Records Act remain reimbursable for some types of agencies.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Best Best & Krieger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.