Conversation vs. Correspondence: New Jersey Ethics Opinion Goes Its Own Way on “Implied Consent”

Cozen O'Connor
Contact

A new ethics opinion from New Jersey turns the concept of “implied consent” under ABA Model Rule 4.2 on its head.

The March 10, 2021 Ethics Opinion from New Jersey -

A recent opinion from the New Jersey Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics, Opinion 739, concludes that “lawyers who initiate a group email and find it convenient to include their client should not then be able to claim an ethics violation if opposing counsel uses a ‘reply all’ response.” In relieving the recipient lawyer of the responsibility to assess whether a “reply all” includes adverse, represented parties, which would potentially violate ABA Model Rule 4.2, (the “no contact” rule), the New Jersey opinion expresses concern over “gotcha” moments and “ethics traps” between lawyers.

Originally published by the American Bar Association on May 06, 2021.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cozen O'Connor | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cozen O'Connor
Contact
more
less

Cozen O'Connor on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide