Court denies motion to transfer to Massachusetts

Morris James LLP
Contact

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., et al., v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., C.A. Nos. 14-1131 – GMS; 15-560-GMS; 15-572-GMS, July 13, 2016.

Sleet, J. Plaintiff’s motion to transfer is denied.

The disputed product is pembrolizumab. This Delaware litigation involves invalidity defenses.  There is related litigation in the District of Massachusetts involving an inventorship challenge.  That court had ordered plaintiffs in this case to file a motion in Delaware requesting a decision on a transfer motion they had made in Massachusetts. This court finds that transfer under 24 U.S.C. section 1404(a) is permissible and questions whether there is sufficient overlap for the first-filed rule to control. The court finds that the requisite relationship between the Massachusetts and Delaware cases does not exist in order to confer personal jurisdiction over two of the parties.  Because this court would not have had personal jurisdiction over two of the parties involved in the transferee forum, transfer under section 1404(a) is improper.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide