Court Enters Judgment Against Colorado Ponzi Scheme Perpetrator


[authors: Emily Stern, Allison Wuertz]

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado recently entered a judgment against Larry Michael Parrish (Parrish), who had operated a Ponzi scheme that raised approximately $9.2 million from at least 70 investors in three different states. To obtain investors, Parrish promised 30% annual returns and claimed that the securities were “extremely low risk.” The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Parrish in March of 2011, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act). The District of Colorado ultimately found Parrish in violation of securities registration, anti-fraud, broker-dealer registration and broker-dealer bar provisions of those acts

Based on the court’s finding of Parrish’s liability, the court granted the SEC’s requested relief of an injunction, disgorgement and a civil penalty. Based on the nature of Parrish’s violations and the fact that he had already been barred by the SEC for operating a prior investment scheme, the court permanently enjoined Parrish from future violations of certain provisions of the Securities Act, Exchange Act and Advisers Act. In addition, the court ordered Parrish to disgorge his “ill-gotten gains.” In the context of a Ponzi scheme, these “ill-gotten gains” consist of subtracting the total distributions to investors from the total contributions from investors. For Parrish, the total disgorgement was $4,139,858 plus pre-judgment interest. Finally, the court also believed that a significant “third-tier” penalty was appropriate. Due to the substantial investor loss that Parrish’s Ponzi scheme caused, Parrish’s promises of 30% returns and characterization of his investment as “low-risk,” and Parrish’s use of some of the investor’s money for his own personal benefit, the court imposed a civil penalty equal to the total disgorgement amount: $4,987,777.26.

SEC v. Parrish, Civil Action No. 111-cv-00558-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Sept. 25, 2012).


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.