Court Enters Judgment Against Colorado Ponzi Scheme Perpetrator


[authors: Emily Stern, Allison Wuertz]

The United States District Court for the District of Colorado recently entered a judgment against Larry Michael Parrish (Parrish), who had operated a Ponzi scheme that raised approximately $9.2 million from at least 70 investors in three different states. To obtain investors, Parrish promised 30% annual returns and claimed that the securities were “extremely low risk.” The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Parrish in March of 2011, alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act). The District of Colorado ultimately found Parrish in violation of securities registration, anti-fraud, broker-dealer registration and broker-dealer bar provisions of those acts

Based on the court’s finding of Parrish’s liability, the court granted the SEC’s requested relief of an injunction, disgorgement and a civil penalty. Based on the nature of Parrish’s violations and the fact that he had already been barred by the SEC for operating a prior investment scheme, the court permanently enjoined Parrish from future violations of certain provisions of the Securities Act, Exchange Act and Advisers Act. In addition, the court ordered Parrish to disgorge his “ill-gotten gains.” In the context of a Ponzi scheme, these “ill-gotten gains” consist of subtracting the total distributions to investors from the total contributions from investors. For Parrish, the total disgorgement was $4,139,858 plus pre-judgment interest. Finally, the court also believed that a significant “third-tier” penalty was appropriate. Due to the substantial investor loss that Parrish’s Ponzi scheme caused, Parrish’s promises of 30% returns and characterization of his investment as “low-risk,” and Parrish’s use of some of the investor’s money for his own personal benefit, the court imposed a civil penalty equal to the total disgorgement amount: $4,987,777.26.

SEC v. Parrish, Civil Action No. 111-cv-00558-WJM-MJW (D. Colo. Sept. 25, 2012).


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.