Court Extends California Whistleblower Protection To Third Party Violations


In California, employees who blow the whistle are protected from retaliation by Labor Code § 1102.5(b) which provides:

“An employer may not retaliate against an employee for disclosing information to a government or law enforcement agency, where the employee has reasonable cause to believe that the information discloses a violation of state or federal statute, or a violation or noncompliance with a state or federal rule or regulation.”

According to the California Supreme Court, the statute embodies California’s public policy interest in encouraging employees to report unlawful acts without fear of retaliation. Green v. Ralee Engineering Co., 19 Cal. 4th 66, 77 (1998).

That may be the policy, but the statute is oddly phrased and less than a model of clarity. For example, it refers to reports to “a government or law enforcement agency”. Do we have law enforcement agencies that are not government agencies? Inexplicably, it also makes a distinction between violation and noncompliance. It refers only to a violation of a statute but then refers to either a violation or noncompliance with a rule or regulation. If a person is not in compliance with a rule, isn’t that person in violation of that rule? More importantly, the statute fails to identify a violator. Because the statute is part of the Labor Code, one might expect that the legislature had employer violations in mind.

What if an employee reports violations by her fellow employees or by her employer’s contractors? The California Court of Appeal answered this question this week in McVeigh v. Recology San Francisco, Cal. Ct. Appeal Case No. A131833 (Jan. 31, 2013) by holding that Section 1102.5(b) “protects employee reports of unlawful activity by third parties such as contractors and employees, as well [as] unlawful activity by an employer.”


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.